Literature DB >> 11311014

In vitro evaluation of the bioadhesive properties of hydrophobic polybasic gels containing N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate-co-methyl methacrylate.

D Quintanar-Guerrero1, R Villalobos-García, E Alvarez-Colín, J M Cornejo-Bravo.   

Abstract

The bioadhesive properties of the hydrophobic, basic polyelectrolyte hydrogel disks containing crosslinked N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate-co-methyl methacrylate 30/70mol% were evaluated in vitro using gastric (pH 1.2), sublingual (pH 6.5), vaginal (pH 4.0) and intestinal (pH 7.5) pig's mucosas. Adhesive strength was measured using a modified Du Noüy tensiometer by measuring the force of detachment between a gel disk and the respective mucosa. The effect of crosslinker content in the gel was evaluated. It was found an increase in the adhesive strength with the increase of crosslinker content in the pH range of 4.0-7.5. For the evaluation at pH 1.2 (gastric mucosa) the opposite behavior was observed. The results indicate that initial bioadhesive contact may be the result of surface energy effects and/or electrostatic interactions of oppositely charged groups between mucin and the gel. In some cases, mucus dehydration may also be involved. When the gel is swollen, chain interpenetration also plays a roll in the bioadhesive interaction. The gels presented bioadhesive forces in gastric and vaginal mucosas (acidic medium), similar to the adhesive forces of well-known bioadhesives such as hydroxymethylcellulose and sodium alginate to the intestinal mucosa. The results indicate that hydrophobic polybasic gels present bioadhesive properties that make them suitable for site specific, pH controlled drug delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11311014     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00260-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  7 in total

1.  Comparative study of the mechanical behaviour of a cyanoacrylate and a bioadhesive.

Authors:  J M García Páez; E Jorge Herrero; A Rocha; M Maestro; J L Castillo-Olivares; I Millan; A Carrera Sanmartin; A Cordon
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  In vitro and ex vivo intestinal tissue models to measure mucoadhesion of poly (methacrylate) and N-trimethylated chitosan polymers.

Authors:  Simon Keely; Atvinder Rullay; Carolyn Wilson; Adrian Carmichael; Steve Carrington; Anthony Corfield; David M Haddleton; David J Brayden
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Effect of pH on sublingual absorption of oxycodone hydrochloride.

Authors:  Abeer M Al-Ghananeem; Ahmad H Malkawi; Peter A Crooks
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 4.  Elastomer-Hydrogel Systems: From Bio-Inspired Interfaces to Medical Applications.

Authors:  Gokhan Demirci; Malwina J Niedźwiedź; Nina Kantor-Malujdy; Miroslawa El Fray
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 5.  Mucus-penetrating nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery to mucosal tissues.

Authors:  Samuel K Lai; Ying-Ying Wang; Justin Hanes
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 15.470

6.  Preactivated thiomers: evaluation of gastroretentive minitablets.

Authors:  Sabine Hauptstein; Christiane Müller; Sarah Dünnhaupt; Flavia Laffleur; Andreas Bernkop-Schnürch
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 7.  Mucoadhesive electrospun nanofibers for drug delivery systems: applications of polymers and the parameters' roles.

Authors:  Graciela Lizeth Pérez-González; Luis Jesús Villarreal-Gómez; Aracely Serrano-Medina; Erick José Torres-Martínez; José Manuel Cornejo-Bravo
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-07-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.