Literature DB >> 11310879

Venereal transmission of pseudorabies viruses indigenous to feral swine.

C H Romero1, P N Meade, J E Shultz, H Y Chung, E P Gibbs, E C Hahn, G Lollis.   

Abstract

Between 1995 and 1998, we designed a series of studies in which we attempted to determine the main routes of transmission involved in the natural infection of pseudorabies virus (PRV) indigenous to free-ranging feral swine (Sus scrofa). Naturally infected feral sows transmitted the infection to uninfected feral boars, with which they had been commingled for a 6-wk period. Pseudorabies virus was isolated from boar preputial swabs, but not from nasal swabs. Three of the same PRV-infected feral sows did not transmit the infection to domestic boars during a 16 wk commingling period, despite the fact that they became pregnant. Feral boars, naturally infected with PRV transmitted the virus to domestic gilts while penned together during 6 wk. Pseudorabies virus was isolated from vaginal swabs, but not from nasal swabs of gilts, after 2 and 3 wk of commingling. When the same infected boars were commingled with either feral or domestic boars for 13 wk, PRV transmission did not occur. None of the exposed boars developed neutralizing antibodies or yielded virus from their preputial or nasal swabs. Our results indicate that PRV indigenous to feral swine is preferentially transmitted to feral or domestic swine of the opposite sex by the venereal route. This mode of transmission differs from that seen in the natural transmission of PRV prevalent in domestic swine, where contaminated secretions, excretions and aerosols are responsible for the spread of the virus. Based on these results, we feel that as long as feral swine do not come into direct contact with domestic swine, PRV-infected feral swine probably pose only a limited risk to the success of the National Pseudorabies Eradication Program. The fact that PRV is usually transmitted from feral to domestic swine at the time of mating would indicate that the isolation of domestic herds by the use of a "double fence," should be adequate protection against reinfection with PRV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11310879     DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-37.2.289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wildl Dis        ISSN: 0090-3558            Impact factor:   1.535


  17 in total

1.  Preferential sexual transmission of pseudorabies virus in feral swine populations may not account for observed seroprevalence in the USA.

Authors:  Gary Smith
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 2.670

2.  Cytokine protein expression levels in tracheobronchial lymph node homogenates of pigs infected with pseudorabies virus.

Authors:  Laura C Miller; Eraldo L Zanella; W Ray Waters; Kelly M Lager
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2010-03-10

Review 3.  Molecular biology of pseudorabies virus: impact on neurovirology and veterinary medicine.

Authors:  Lisa E Pomeranz; Ashley E Reynolds; Christoph J Hengartner
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 4.  Wild boars as sources for infectious diseases in livestock and humans.

Authors:  X J Meng; D S Lindsay; N Sriranganathan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Risk factors for contacts between wild boar and outdoor pigs in Switzerland and investigations on potential Brucella suis spill-over.

Authors:  Natacha Wu; Carlos Abril; Andreas Thomann; Eleonore Grosclaude; Marcus G Doherr; Patrick Boujon; Marie-Pierre Ryser-Degiorgis
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Vaccine resistant pseudorabies virus causes mink infection in China.

Authors:  Gui-Sheng Wang; Yijun Du; Jia-Qiang Wu; Fu-Lin Tian; Xue-Jie Yu; Jin-Bao Wang
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Pseudorabies virus can be classified into five genotypes using partial sequences of UL44.

Authors:  A A Fonseca; M F Camargos; M L Sales; M B Heinemann; R C Leite; J K P Reis
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.476

8.  Wildlife health investigations: needs, challenges and recommendations.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Ryser-Degiorgis
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  A picture of trends in Aujeszky's disease virus exposure in wild boar in the Swiss and European contexts.

Authors:  Roman Kaspar Meier; Francisco Ruiz-Fons; Marie-Pierre Ryser-Degiorgis
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Replication characteristics of equine herpesvirus 1 and equine herpesvirus 3: comparative analysis using ex vivo tissue cultures.

Authors:  Haileleul Negussie; Yewei Li; Tesfaye Sisay Tessema; Hans J Nauwynck
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.