Literature DB >> 11310865

Intra-articular load distribution in the human ankle joint during motion.

J D Michelson1, M Checcone, T Kuhn, K Varner.   

Abstract

The rational treatment of injuries to the ankle is predicated on an understanding of biomechanics of the ankle. While several investigators have reported on three-dimensional dynamic kinematics of the ankle and on the static distribution of pressure within the ankle, it has not been possible to measure intra-articular forces reliably under dynamic conditions. The assumption that the distribution of forces under dynamic conditions is well represented by statically determined forces has not been validated, leaving in question the applicability to dynamic conditions of data obtained under static conditions. This study characterizes an electro-mechanical thin-membrane force transducer with potential for intra-articular use. The sensor was found to yield a reproducible linear response to loads experienced in the ankle, and was insensitive to both a moist environment and shearing forces. On the basis of these results, these force-transducers were placed in axially loaded cadaveric ankles that were either statically or dynamically cycled through a physiologic range of motion. In each of six specimens, sensors were secured to the medial and lateral malleolar articular surfaces, and to articular surfaces of the medial and lateral tibial plafond. Both medial and lateral malleolar-talar forces increased with dorsiflexion. Moving from plantarflexion to dorsiflexion caused an increase in lateral tibio-talar load accompanied by a decrease in the medial tibio-talar loading. There was no significant hysteresis in force-distribution with respect to the direction of sagittal motion. There was no difference between the forces measured under static or dynamic conditions. This study validates the use of static loading methodologies in future studies of force-distribution. Our data in intact ankles closely corresponded to data on forces under dynamic conditions. Dorsiflexion caused an increase in both medially and laterally directed forces towards the malleoli. This is the first demonstration of such forces, which are responsible for the external rotation and lateral translation of the distal fibula that occurs in dorsiflexion of the ankle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11310865     DOI: 10.1177/107110070102200310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  6 in total

1.  Long-term stress distribution patterns of the ankle joint in varus knee alignment assessed by computed tomography osteoabsorptiometry.

Authors:  Tomohiro Onodera; Tokifumi Majima; Norimasa Iwasaki; Tamotsu Kamishima; Yasuhiko Kasahara; Akio Minami
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  In vitro measurement of intraarticular pressure in the ankle joint.

Authors:  Andreas Suckel; Otto Muller; Nikolaus Wachter; Torsten Kluba
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Extrinsic Muscle Forces Affect Ankle Loading Before and After Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tassos Natsakis; Josefien Burg; Greta Dereymaeker; Jos Vander Sloten; Ilse Jonkers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Characterization of Changes in Subchondral Bone Tissue Density of the Ankle Joint in Taekwondo Players.

Authors:  Guanghua Xu; Hongyu Liu; Lifu Zhang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-04

5.  Insertion of a pressure sensing arrayminimally affects hindfoot bone kinematics.

Authors:  Tassos Natsakis; Josefien Burg; Greta Dereymaeker; Ilse Jonkers; Jos Vander Sloten
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  An extended discrete element method for the estimation of contact pressure at the ankle joint during stance phase.

Authors:  Ivan Benemerito; Luca Modenese; Erica Montefiori; Claudia Mazzà; Marco Viceconti; Damien Lacroix; Lingzhong Guo
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 1.617

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.