Literature DB >> 11310511

Manuscript peer review--a guide for health care professionals.

L M Sylvia1, J L Herbel.   

Abstract

Peer review, in which peer experts assess the value of a manuscript submitted to a professional journal, is regarded as a crucial step in publication. It is generally agreed that its usefulness is highly dependent on the preparedness of each reviewer and quality of each assessment. With sustained growth in biomedical publications, more and more health professionals are being called on to serve as peer reviewers. An instructional framework should assist pharmacists and other health care professionals in conducting high-quality manuscript reviews.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11310511     DOI: 10.1592/phco.21.5.395.34493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  5 in total

1.  The JAMIA Student Editorial Board: peer review education in biomedical informatics.

Authors:  Kevin B Johnson; Randolph A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Editors' Perspectives on Enhancing Manuscript Quality and Editorial Decisions Through Peer Review and Reviewer Development.

Authors:  Kristin K Janke; Andrew S Bzowyckyj; Andrew P Traynor
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  On Peer Review.

Authors:  Jody Kreiman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 4.  Improving the peer review skills of young rheumatologists and researchers in rheumatology: the EMEUNET Peer Review Mentoring Program.

Authors:  Javier Rodríguez-Carrio; Polina Putrik; Alexandre Sepriano; Anna Moltó; Elena Nikiphorou; Laure Gossec; Tore K Kvien; Sofia Ramiro
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2018-02-16

Review 5.  Peer review process in medical journals.

Authors:  Young Gyu Cho; Hyun Ah Park
Journal:  Korean J Fam Med       Date:  2013-11-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.