Literature DB >> 11309617

The concepts of 'sameness' and 'difference' in an insect.

M Giurfa1, S Zhang, A Jenett, R Menzel, M V Srinivasan.   

Abstract

Insects process and learn information flexibly to adapt to their environment. The honeybee Apis mellifera constitutes a traditional model for studying learning and memory at behavioural, cellular and molecular levels. Earlier studies focused on elementary associative and non-associative forms of learning determined by either olfactory conditioning of the proboscis extension reflex or the learning of visual stimuli in an operant context. However, research has indicated that bees are capable of cognitive performances that were thought to occur only in some vertebrate species. For example, honeybees can interpolate visual information, exhibit associative recall, categorize visual information and learn contextual information. Here we show that honeybees can form 'sameness' and 'difference' concepts. They learn to solve 'delayed matching-to-sample' tasks, in which they are required to respond to a matching stimulus, and 'delayed non-matching-to-sample' tasks, in which they are required to respond to a different stimulus; they can also transfer the learned rules to new stimuli of the same or a different sensory modality. Thus, not only can bees learn specific objects and their physical parameters, but they can also master abstract inter-relationships, such as sameness and difference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11309617     DOI: 10.1038/35073582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  133 in total

1.  Fine colour discrimination requires differential conditioning in bumblebees.

Authors:  Adrian G Dyer; Lars Chittka
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-02-27

2.  The ubiquity of consciousness.

Authors:  Anthony J Trewavas; František Baluška
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Optimal inference of sameness.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Michael Vogel; Kresimir Josic; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Evaluating the evidence base for relational frame theory: a citation analysis.

Authors:  Simon Dymond; Richard J May; Anita Munnelly; Alice E Hoon
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2010

Review 5.  Costs of memory: lessons from 'mini' brains.

Authors:  James G Burns; Julien Foucaud; Frederic Mery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sequential learning of relative size by the Neotropical ant Gigantiops destructor.

Authors:  Guy Beugnon; David Macquart
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Cross-modal interaction between visual and olfactory learning in Apis cerana.

Authors:  Li-Zhen Zhang; Shao-Wu Zhang; Zi-Long Wang; Wei-Yu Yan; Zhi-Jiang Zeng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 8.  Honeybees foraging for numbers.

Authors:  Martin Giurfa
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 9.  On the generality and limits of abstraction in rats and humans.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Bayesian learning and the psychology of rule induction.

Authors:  Ansgar D Endress
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.