Literature DB >> 11309301

Epigenetic patterns in the progression of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

C A Eads1, R V Lord, K Wickramasinghe, T I Long, S K Kurumboor, L Bernstein, J H Peters, S R DeMeester, T R DeMeester, K A Skinner, P W Laird.   

Abstract

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) arises after normal squamous mucosa undergoes metaplasia to specialized columnar epithelium (intestinal metaplasia or Barrett's esophagus), which can then ultimately progress to dysplasia and subsequent malignancy. Epigenetic studies of this model have thus far been limited to the DNA methylation analysis of a few genes. In this study, we analyzed a panel of 20 genes using a quantitative, high-throughput methylation assay, METHYLIGHT: We used this broader approach to gain insight into concordant methylation behavior between genes and to generate epigenomic fingerprints for the different histological stages of EAC. Our study included a total of 104 tissue specimens from 51 patients with different stages of Barrett's esophagus and/or associated adenocarcinoma. We screened 84 of these samples with the full panel of 20 genes and found distinct classes of methylation patterns in the different types of tissue. The most informative genes were those with an intermediate frequency of significant hypermethylation [ranging from 15% (CDKN2A) to 60% (MGMT) of the samples]. This group could be further subdivided into three classes, according to the absence (CDKN2A, ESR1, and MYOD1) or presence (CALCA, MGMT, and TIMP3) of methylation in normal esophageal mucosa and stomach, or the infrequent methylation of normal esophageal mucosa accompanied by methylation in all normal stomach samples (APC). The other genes were less informative, because the frequency of hypermethylation was below 5% (ARF, CDH1, CDKN2B, GSTP1, MLH1, PTGS2, and THBS1), completely absent (CTNNB1, RB1, TGFBR2, and TYMS1), or ubiquitous (HIC1 and MTHFR), regardless of tissue type. Each class undergoes unique epigenetic changes at different steps of disease progression of EAC, suggesting a step-wise loss of multiple protective barriers against CpG island hypermethylation. The aberrant hypermethylation occurs at many different loci in the same tissues, suggestive of an overall deregulation of methylation control in EAC tumorigenesis. However, we did not find evidence for a distinct group of tumors with a CpG island methylator phenotype. Finally, we found that normal and metaplastic tissues from patients with evidence of associated dysplasia or cancer had a significantly higher incidence of hypermethylation than similar tissues from patients with no further progression of their disease. The fact that the samples from these two groups of patients were histologically indistinguishable, yet molecularly distinct, suggests that the occurrence of such hypermethylation may provide a clinical tool to identify patients with premalignant Barrett's who are at risk for further progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11309301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  177 in total

1.  Barrett's esophagus: is dysplasia a reliable marker in surveillance after endoscopic treatment?

Authors:  M A Ortner
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2001-10

Review 2.  Stress and the epigenetic landscape: a link to the pathobiology of human diseases?

Authors:  Sarah E Johnstone; Stephen B Baylin
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Epigenetic silencing of somatostatin in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kaya Jackson; Mohammed Soutto; DunFa Peng; TianLing Hu; Dana Marshal; Wael El-Rifai
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Epigenetic biomarkers in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Andrew M Kaz; William M Grady
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 5.  Early events during neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Brian J Reid
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.388

6.  Acid-induced p16 hypermethylation contributes to development of esophageal adenocarcinoma via activation of NADPH oxidase NOX5-S.

Authors:  Jie Hong; Murray Resnick; Jose Behar; Li Juan Wang; Jack Wands; Ronald A DeLellis; Rhonda F Souza; Stuart J Spechler; Weibiao Cao
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 7.  Cdx genes, inflammation, and the pathogenesis of intestinal metaplasia.

Authors:  Douglas B Stairs; Jianping Kong; John P Lynch
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.622

8.  Prognostic significance of gene-specific promoter hypermethylation in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Yoon Hee Cho; Jing Shen; Marilie D Gammon; Yu-Jing Zhang; Qiao Wang; Karina Gonzalez; Xinran Xu; Patrick T Bradshaw; Susan L Teitelbaum; Gail Garbowski; Hanina Hibshoosh; Alfred I Neugut; Jia Chen; Regina M Santella
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  p16 Methylation is associated with chemosensitivity to fluorouracil in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Mingming Wang; Yilin Li; Jing Gao; Yanyan Li; Jing Zhou; Liankun Gu; Lin Shen; Dajun Deng
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  DNA hypermethylation regulates the expression of members of the Mu-class glutathione S-transferases and glutathione peroxidases in Barrett's adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  D F Peng; M Razvi; H Chen; K Washington; A Roessner; R Schneider-Stock; W El-Rifai
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.