Literature DB >> 11308139

CALGB 9380: a prospective trial of the feasibility of thoracoscopy/laparoscopy in staging esophageal cancer.

M J Krasna1, C E Reed, D Nedzwiecki, D R Hollis, J D Luketich, M M DeCamp, R J Mayer, D J Sugarbaker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The staging of esophageal cancer is imprecise. Thoracoscopic/laparoscopic (TS/LS) staging has been proposed as a more accurate lymph node (LN) staging method. We report the experience of an Intergroup NCI trial (CALGB 9380) evaluating the feasibility and accuracy of this staging modality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 1995 to September 1999, 134 patients were entered in the study. This study represents the analysis of final data on 113 patients. TS/LS was considered feasible if TS and 1 LN sampled at least 3 LN by LS; a confirmed positive node was found; or T4 or M1 disease was documented. If this was accomplished in more than 70% of patients, TS/LS was believed to be feasible.
RESULTS: The LN stations most frequently sampled in the thorax (134 patients) were levels 2 (33%), 3 (38%), 4 (40%), 7 (76%), 8 (69%), 9 (55%), and 10 (43%) and in the abdomen levels 17 (70%) and 20 (55%). The frequency of positive LN by level were as follows: 2 (10%), 3 (8%), 4 (10%), 7 (10%), 8 (25%), 9 (10%), 10 (10%), 17 (34%), and 20 (27%). Noninvasive tests (computed tomographic scan, magnetic resonance imaging, esophageal ultrasound scan) each incorrectly identified TN staging as noted by missed positive or false-negative LN or metastatic disease found at TS/LS staging in 50%, 40%, and 30% of patients, respectively. Median operating time was 210 minutes (range, 40 to 865 minutes). Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (range, 1 to 35 days). There were no deaths or major complications. Seventy-three percent of patients met the definition for feasibility. In 30 patients TS was not feasible. Positive LN disease was found in 43 patients; 32 were deemed N0. Ten patients had T4/M1 disease. Of the 32 potentially resectable N0 patients, 14 patients had preoperative induction therapy; 13 patients went directly to operation with N0 confirmed in 9 patients, NX in 1 and N1 in 3. Three patients were unresectable, 1 patient died, and 1 was lost to follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the feasibility of TS/LS was confirmed. It doubled the number of positive LNs identified by conventional, noninvasive staging. The overall accuracy remains to be defined by analysis of the LN negative group in follow-up. Although the positive predictive value was high, further study is warranted to confirm the role of TS/LS in the staging algorithm of esophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11308139     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02680-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  14 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic laparoscopy: indications and benefits.

Authors:  Beate Rau; Michael Hünerbein
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Surgical management of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Amit N Patel; John T Preskitt; Joseph A Kuhn; Robert F Hebeler; Richard E Wood; Harold C Urschel
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-07

Review 3.  Current management of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Simon Law; John Wong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Minimally invasive surgical treatment of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Arjun Pennathur; James D Luketich
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11

Review 5.  Minimally invasive staging of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Kunal Mehta; Valentino Bianco; Omar Awais; James D Luketich; Arjun Pennathur
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-03

Review 6.  [Staging laparoscopy in oncology].

Authors:  H Feussner; F Härtl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  The role of staging laparoscopy for intraabdominal cancers: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  L Chang; D Stefanidis; W S Richardson; D B Earle; R D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Stage-specific therapy for cancer of the oesophagus: a new 'cancer of the elderly'.

Authors:  Mark J Krasna
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  The role of FDG-PET and staging laparoscopy in the management of patients with cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Harry H Yoon; Val J Lowe; Stephen D Cassivi; Yvonne Romero
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 10.  Evaluation of preoperative staging for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lin-Na Luo; Long-Jun He; Xiao-Yan Gao; Xin-Xin Huang; Hong-Bo Shan; Guang-Yu Luo; Yin Li; Shi-Yong Lin; Guo-Bao Wang; Rong Zhang; Guo-Liang Xu; Jian-Jun Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.