Literature DB >> 11308106

Antepartum bed rest: effect upon the family.

J A Maloni1, J E Brezinski-Tomasi, L A Johnson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the effects of antepartum bed rest upon the family.
DESIGN: Descriptive, retrospective survey. PARTICIPANTS: A national random selection of 89 women who had been prescribed antepartum bed rest in the hospital or at home and who contacted a high-risk pregnancy support group for information. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: An open-ended questionnaire.
RESULTS: Families experienced difficulty assuming maternal responsibilities, anxiety about maternalfetal outcomes, and adverse emotional effects on the children. Child care was managed by various people across time. Child care problems included negative reactions from the children, concern about the quality of the provider, and maternal worry about care. Families also experienced financial difficulties, the majority of which were not compensated by insurance or work benefits. Almost all, 96.6%, families received some type of support during bed rest. Instrumental support was the most commonly received; however, emotional support was considered the most helpful. The least helpful type of support was that which was unreliable. The primary providers of support to the family were parents and family, followed by friends. The women reported that health care providers offered minimal support to the family.
CONCLUSION: Despite support, antepartum bed rest creates difficulties that affect the entire family and its finances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11308106     DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2001.tb01532.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs        ISSN: 0090-0311


  7 in total

1.  Lack of evidence for prescription of antepartum bed rest.

Authors:  Judith A Maloni
Journal:  Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07-01

Review 2.  Bed rest in singleton pregnancies for preventing preterm birth.

Authors:  Claudio G Sosa; Fernando Althabe; José M Belizán; Eduardo Bergel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-03-30

3.  Factors associated with tocolytic hospitalizations in Taiwan: evidence from a population-based and longitudinal study from 1997 to 2004.

Authors:  Ke-Zong Michelle Ma; Edward C Norton; Eing-Mei Tsai; Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Prenatal depression in women hospitalized for obstetric risk.

Authors:  Anna R Brandon; Madhukar H Trivedi; Linda S Hynan; Paula D Miltenberger; Dana Broussard Labat; Jamie B Rifkin; C Allen Stringer
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 5.  Bed rest during pregnancy for preventing miscarriage.

Authors:  A Aleman; F Althabe; J Belizán; E Bergel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-04-18

6.  Changing prevalence and the risk factors for antenatal obstetric hospitalizations in Denmark 2003-2012.

Authors:  Jane Bendix; Hanne Kristine Hegaard; Jens Langhoff-Roos; Thomas Bergholt
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  Quantitative assessment of physical activity in pregnant women with sonographic short cervix and the risk for preterm delivery: A prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Roni Zemet; Eyal Schiff; Zipora Manovitch; Tal Cahan; Rakefet Yoeli-Ullman; Benny Brandt; Israel Hendler; Lilia Dorfman-Margolis; Yoav Yinon; Eyal Sivan; Shali Mazaki-Tovi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.