OBJECTIVE: To analyze the use of various coping strategies in homogeneous groups of patients with hemophilia and von Willebrand's disease and to investigate the relationship between the state of the disease, the use of coping strategies, and management of the disease. METHODS: The coping strategies measured by the Coping Strategies Questionnaire were analyzed in 3 homogeneous groups of 224 patients. Psychosocial well-being (PWB) measured by the Rand 36-item Health Survey 1.0 was used as an indicator of management of the disease. The pain factor consisted of the following variables: pain intensity, use of analgesics, Functional Disability Index, and physical activity level. RESULTS: The groups of patients differed significantly only in the use of the catastrophizing strategy (CAT). In all pain groups, distraction was the most commonly used coping strategy. A significant interaction effect of pain factor and age on PWB (P = 0.04) was found. The mediating function of the CAT strategy was confirmed by the series of regression analyses. CONCLUSION: The coping strategy profile in hemophilia was found to be similar to those in other chronic pain states. The use of the strategies does not depend on the severity of the disease. We confirmed the role of age and the use of the CAT strategy as, respectively, moderator and mediator in the pattern of relationships between the clinical state of the disease and psychosocial well-being.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the use of various coping strategies in homogeneous groups of patients with hemophilia and von Willebrand's disease and to investigate the relationship between the state of the disease, the use of coping strategies, and management of the disease. METHODS: The coping strategies measured by the Coping Strategies Questionnaire were analyzed in 3 homogeneous groups of 224 patients. Psychosocial well-being (PWB) measured by the Rand 36-item Health Survey 1.0 was used as an indicator of management of the disease. The pain factor consisted of the following variables: pain intensity, use of analgesics, Functional Disability Index, and physical activity level. RESULTS: The groups of patients differed significantly only in the use of the catastrophizing strategy (CAT). In all pain groups, distraction was the most commonly used coping strategy. A significant interaction effect of pain factor and age on PWB (P = 0.04) was found. The mediating function of the CAT strategy was confirmed by the series of regression analyses. CONCLUSION: The coping strategy profile in hemophilia was found to be similar to those in other chronic pain states. The use of the strategies does not depend on the severity of the disease. We confirmed the role of age and the use of the CAT strategy as, respectively, moderator and mediator in the pattern of relationships between the clinical state of the disease and psychosocial well-being.