Literature DB >> 11307694

Current best practice for the health surveillance of enzyme workers in the soap and detergent industry.

P J Nicholson1, A J Newman Taylor, P Oliver, M Cathcart.   

Abstract

This study defines current best practice for the health surveillance of workers who are potentially exposed to enzymes in the manufacture of enzymatic detergent products. It is recommended that health surveillance is performed 6-monthly for the first 2 years and annually thereafter. The health surveillance programme should include a respiratory questionnaire to detect symptoms, assessment of lung function to detect pre-symptomatic changes and an immunological test to detect specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) to enzymes. The International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease respiratory questionnaire should be used since it has been validated extensively for detecting asthma. Operators should observe the American Thoracic Society performance criteria for spirometers and standardized procedures for conducting spirometry. Since current airborne monitoring techniques for enzymes do not detect short-duration peak exposures, the incidence of employee sensitizations remains the most reliable measure of the integrity of environmental control. The Pepys skin prick test has been validated as a sensitive, specific and practical test for detecting specific IgE to many inhalant allergens including enzymes. For newly sensitized workers, a multi-cause investigation should be conducted to identify potential sources of exposure. Group results of immunological test results assist in the evaluation of workplace control measures, and should be used to monitor the effectiveness of hygiene and engineering programmes and to help prioritize areas for improvement. Positive responses to a questionnaire or abnormal spirometry should be assessed further. Occupational asthma should be excluded in any case of adult-onset asthma that starts or deteriorates during working life. This is particularly important because an accurate diagnosis of occupational asthma with early avoidance of exposure to its cause can result in remission of symptoms and restoration of lung function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11307694     DOI: 10.1093/occmed/51.2.081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)        ISSN: 0962-7480            Impact factor:   1.611


  5 in total

1.  Occupational asthma case finding: a role for primary care.

Authors:  Mark L Levy; Paul J Nicholson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Career Advice for Young Allergy Patients.

Authors:  Katja Radon; Dennis Nowak; Christian Vogelberg; Franziska Ruëff
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Managing the Risk of Occupational Allergy in the Enzyme Detergent Industry.

Authors:  David A Basketter; Francis H Kruszewski; Sophie Mathieu; Donald Bruce Kirchner; Anthony Panepinto; Mark Fieldsend; Volker Siegert; Fiona Barnes; Robert Bookstaff; Merete Simonsen; Beth Concoby
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Prevalence and predictors of occupational asthma among workers in detergent and cleaning products industry and its impact on quality of life in El Asher Men Ramadan, Egypt.

Authors:  Amani Shawki Ahmed; Dalia Anas Ibrahim; Tarek Hamdy Hassan; Wael Galal Abd-El-Azem
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 5.190

Review 5.  EAACI position paper on occupational rhinitis.

Authors:  Gianna Moscato; Olivier Vandenplas; Roy Gerth Van Wijk; Jean-Luc Malo; Luca Perfetti; Santiago Quirce; Jolanta Walusiak; Roberto Castano; Gianni Pala; Denyse Gautrin; Hans De Groot; Ilenia Folletti; Mona Rita Yacoub; Andrea Siracusa
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2009-03-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.