D C Goff1, G Howard, G B Russell, D R Labarthe. 1. Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1063, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Mean blood pressure (BP) has declined in the U.S. for several decades. It is unknown to what extent this decline was due to treatment of persons with recognized high BP or to population-wide influences on BP. Treatment would shift only the highest values lower, whereas, population-wide influences on BP would shift the entire distribution downward. METHODS: We examined changes in the distributions of systolic and diastolic BP (SBP, DBP) across birth cohorts born between 1887 and 1975 in 52,646 individuals examined in the National Health (and Nutrition) Examination Surveys between 1960 and 1994. The BP distributions were estimated as functions of age and birth-year to examine changes between birth cohorts. We postulated that the age-adjusted 10th, 50th and 90th percentiles of SBP and DBP had decreased in more recent versus earlier birth cohorts. RESULTS: The series of birth cohorts exhibited successively lower SBP and DBP at low, middle and high percentiles. In general, the 10th percentile of SBP decreased approximately 1.19 mmHg per decade of birth-year, whereas the 50th percentile decreased 2.40 mmHg per decade, and the 90th percentile decreased 4.62 mmHg per decade. A similar pattern of results was seen for DBP. CONCLUSIONS: The entire distribution of both SBP and DBP shifted downward. The downward shifts at the 50th percentile and below unequivocally demonstrate a strong prevention effect in the U.S. population during the period 1887 through 1975. This epidemiologic analysis indicates that population-wide influences can alter favorably the distribution of BP throughout the whole population.
PURPOSE: Mean blood pressure (BP) has declined in the U.S. for several decades. It is unknown to what extent this decline was due to treatment of persons with recognized high BP or to population-wide influences on BP. Treatment would shift only the highest values lower, whereas, population-wide influences on BP would shift the entire distribution downward. METHODS: We examined changes in the distributions of systolic and diastolic BP (SBP, DBP) across birth cohorts born between 1887 and 1975 in 52,646 individuals examined in the National Health (and Nutrition) Examination Surveys between 1960 and 1994. The BP distributions were estimated as functions of age and birth-year to examine changes between birth cohorts. We postulated that the age-adjusted 10th, 50th and 90th percentiles of SBP and DBP had decreased in more recent versus earlier birth cohorts. RESULTS: The series of birth cohorts exhibited successively lower SBP and DBP at low, middle and high percentiles. In general, the 10th percentile of SBP decreased approximately 1.19 mmHg per decade of birth-year, whereas the 50th percentile decreased 2.40 mmHg per decade, and the 90th percentile decreased 4.62 mmHg per decade. A similar pattern of results was seen for DBP. CONCLUSIONS: The entire distribution of both SBP and DBP shifted downward. The downward shifts at the 50th percentile and below unequivocally demonstrate a strong prevention effect in the U.S. population during the period 1887 through 1975. This epidemiologic analysis indicates that population-wide influences can alter favorably the distribution of BP throughout the whole population.
Authors: Wanda K Jones; Robert A Hahn; R Gibson Parrish; Steven M Teutsch; Man-Huei Chang Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Audrey C Choh; Ramzi W Nahhas; Miryoung Lee; Youn Su Choi; William C Chumlea; Dana L Duren; Richard J Sherwood; Bradford Towne; Roger M Siervogel; Ellen W Demerath; Stefan A Czerwinski Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Gitanjali M Singh; Goodarz Danaei; Pamela M Pelizzari; John K Lin; Melanie J Cowan; Gretchen A Stevens; Farshad Farzadfar; Young-Ho Khang; Yuan Lu; Leanne M Riley; Stephen S Lim; Majid Ezzati Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-04-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Daniel T Lackland; Edward J Roccella; Anne F Deutsch; Myriam Fornage; Mary G George; George Howard; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Lee H Schwamm; Eric E Smith; Amytis Towfighi Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Majid Ezzati; Ziad Obermeyer; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Bongani M Mayosi; Paul Elliott; David A Leon Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Daniel T Lackland; Virginia J Howard; Mary Cushman; Suzanne Oparil; Brett Kissela; Monika M Safford; Dawn O Kleindorfer; Leslie A McClure; George Howard Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-10-05 Impact factor: 29.690