Literature DB >> 11306148

Calculating confidence intervals for the number needed to treat.

R Bender1.   

Abstract

The number needed to treat (NNT) has gained much attention in the past years as a useful way of reporting the results of randomized controlled trials with a binary outcome. Defined as the reciprocal of the absolute risk reduction (ARR), NNT is the estimated average number of patients needed to be treated to prevent an adverse outcome in one additional patient. As with other estimated effect measures, it is important to document the uncertainty of the estimation by means of an appropriate confidence interval. Confidence intervals for NNT can be obtained by inverting and exchanging the confidence limits for the ARR provided that the NNT scale ranging from 1 through infinity to -1 is taken into account. Unfortunately, the only method used in practice to calculate confidence intervals for ARR seems to be the simple Wald method, which yields too short confidence intervals in many cases. In this paper it is shown that the application of the Wilson score method improves the calculation and presentation of confidence intervals for the number needed to treat. Control Clin Trials 2001;22:102-110

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11306148     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(00)00134-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  58 in total

1.  Missing the point (estimate)? Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat.

Authors:  Nicholas J Barrowman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Transscleral local resection versus iodine brachytherapy for uveal melanomas that are large because of tumour height.

Authors:  Ilkka Puusaari; Bertil Damato; Tero Kivelä
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Aspiration and swallowing in Parkinson disease and rehabilitation with EMST: a randomized trial.

Authors:  M S Troche; M S Okun; J C Rosenbek; N Musson; H H Fernandez; R Rodriguez; J Romrell; T Pitts; K M Wheeler-Hegland; C M Sapienza
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Quantitative image quality evaluation of MR images using perceptual difference models.

Authors:  Jun Miao; Donglai Huo; David L Wilson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Effect of primary care intervention on breastfeeding duration and intensity.

Authors:  Karen Bonuck; Alison Stuebe; Josephine Barnett; Miriam H Labbok; Jason Fletcher; Peter S Bernstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Illustrating risk difference and number needed to treat from a randomized controlled trial of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache.

Authors:  Mitchell Haas; Michael Schneider; Darcy Vavrek
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2010-05-24

7.  Using and Interpreting Adjusted NNT Measures in Biomedical Research.

Authors:  Ralf Bender
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2010-07-16

8.  Serum phosphorus and association with anemia among a large diverse population with and without chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Lac Tran; Michael Batech; Connie M Rhee; Elani Streja; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Steven J Jacobsen; John J Sim
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 5.992

9.  Economic evaluation of caspofungin vs liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy of suspected systemic fungal infection in the German hospital setting.

Authors:  Peter Kaskel; Silja Tuschy; Alexander Wagner; Christian Bannert; Oliver A Cornely; Axel Glasmacher; Hans-Peter Lipp; Andrew J Ullmann
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.673

10.  Estimating the number needed to treat from continuous outcomes in randomised controlled trials: methodological challenges and worked example using data from the UK Back Pain Exercise and Manipulation (BEAM) trial.

Authors:  Robert Froud; Sandra Eldridge; Ranjit Lall; Martin Underwood
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.