Literature DB >> 11305785

The accuracy of segregation of human mini-chromosomes varies in different vertebrate cell lines, correlates with the extent of centromere formation and provides evidence for a trans-acting centromere maintenance activity.

M H Shen1, J W Yang, J Yang, C Pendon, W R Brown.   

Abstract

We show that the accuracy of mitotic segregation of three engineered, mapped human mini-chromosomes differs between human, mouse and chicken cell lines. We have studied the cause of these differences by analysing the extent of centromere formation on one mini-chromosome immunocytochemically. In human and chicken cell lines the mini-chromosomes segregate accurately and form centromeres but in one mouse cell line centromere formation is undetectable and mitotic segregation is inaccurate. These results indicate that the centromere is maintained by an activity that functions in trans and varies either in amount or specificity between different cells. Structurally defined mini-chromosomes may allow this activity to be studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11305785     DOI: 10.1007/s004120000110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  10 in total

1.  Localisation of centromeric proteins to a fraction of mouse minor satellite DNA on a mini-chromosome in human, mouse and chicken cells.

Authors:  Kang Zeng; Jose I de las Heras; Andrew Ross; Jian Yang; Howard Cooke; Ming Hong Shen
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Topoisomerase II cleavage activity within the human D11Z1 and DXZ1 alpha-satellite arrays.

Authors:  Jennifer M Spence; R E Keith Fournier; Mitsuo Oshimura; Vinciane Regnier; Christine J Farr
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  Artificial and engineered chromosomes: developments and prospects for gene therapy.

Authors:  Brenda R Grimes; Zoia Larin Monaco
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Increased missegregation and chromosome loss with decreasing chromosome size in vertebrate cells.

Authors:  Jennifer M Spence; Walter Mills; Kathy Mann; Clare Huxley; Christine J Farr
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Prospects for the use of artificial chromosomes and minichromosome-like episomes in gene therapy.

Authors:  Sara Pérez-Luz; Javier Díaz-Nido
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-08-24

6.  Human artificial chromosomes with alpha satellite-based de novo centromeres show increased frequency of nondisjunction and anaphase lag.

Authors:  M Katharine Rudd; Robert W Mays; Stuart Schwartz; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Artificial chromosome formation in maize (Zea mays L.).

Authors:  Evgueni V Ananiev; Chengcang Wu; Mark A Chamberlin; Sergei Svitashev; Chris Schwartz; William Gordon-Kamm; Scott Tingey
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 8.  Human artificial chromosome vectors meet stem cells: new prospects for gene delivery.

Authors:  Xianying Ren; Candice Ginn T Tahimic; Motonobu Katoh; Akihiro Kurimasa; Toshiaki Inoue; Mitsuo Oshimura
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.692

9.  Interspecies conservation of organisation and function between nonhomologous regional centromeres.

Authors:  Pin Tong; Alison L Pidoux; Nicholas R T Toda; Ryan Ard; Harald Berger; Manu Shukla; Jesus Torres-Garcia; Carolin A Müller; Conrad A Nieduszynski; Robin C Allshire
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  HAC stability in murine cells is influenced by nuclear localization and chromatin organization.

Authors:  Daniela Moralli; David Y L Chan; Andrew Jefferson; Emanuela V Volpi; Zoia L Monaco
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.