Literature DB >> 11305279

The effects of hook pattern and kyphotic angulation on mechanical strength and apical rod strain in a long-segment posterior construct using a synthetic model.

P J Belmont1, D W Polly, B W Cunningham, W R Klemme.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Synthetic spine models were used to compare the effects of hook pattern and kyphotic angulation on stiffness and rod strain in long-segment posterior spinal constructs.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the biomechanical effects of hook patterns and kyphotic angulation on long-segment posterior spinal constructs. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Kyphotic deformities managed by increasing rod diameter and hence construct stiffness have shown decreased postoperative loss of correction and hardware complications. The biomechanical effects of hook pattern and kyphosis are unknown.
METHODS: Spine models of 0 degrees, 27 degrees 54 degrees sagittal contour, composed of polypropylene vertebral blocks and isoprene elastomer intervertebral spacers, representing T3-T12, were used for biomechanical testing of long-segment posterior spinal constructs. Models were instrumented with 6.35-mm titanium rods and one of the following hook configurations: 20-hook compression, 16-hook compression, 16-hook claw apex-empty,16-hook claw apex-full, or 8-hook claw. Construct stiffness and rod strain during axial compression were determined.
RESULTS: The compression-hook patterns provided at least a 45% increase in construct stiffness (P = 0.013)and a 22% decrease in rod strain (P < 0.0001) compared with those obtained with the claw-hook pattern with the best biomechanical performance. When analyzing all five hook patterns, there was a 19% decrease in construct stiffness and 27% increase in rod strain when progressing from straight alignment to 27 degrees of sagittal contour (P < 0.0001). Progressing from straight alignment to 54 degrees decreased construct stiffness by 48% and increased rod strain by 55% (P < 0.0001). Construct stiffness was inversely correlated to rod strain in all five hook patterns (R2 = 0.82-0.98, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Using compressive-hook patterns and decreasing the kyphotic deformity significantly increases construct stiffness and decreases rod strain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11305279     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200103150-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Biomechanical study of anterior spinal instrumentation configurations.

Authors:  Luc P Cloutier; Carl-Eric Aubin; Guy Grimard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  CoCr rods provide better frontal correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by all-pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Mayalen Lamerain; Manon Bachy; Marion Delpont; Reda Kabbaj; Pierre Mary; Raphaël Vialle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Vertebral height restoration in osteoporotic compression fractures: kyphoplasty balloon tamp is superior to postural correction alone.

Authors:  M K Shindle; M J Gardner; J Koob; S Bukata; J A Cabin; J M Lane
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Outcome and efficacy of height gain and sagittal alignment after kyphoplasty of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Tae-One Lee; Dae-Jean Jo; Sung-Min Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2007-10-20

5.  Predictors of kyphotic deformity in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a radiological study.

Authors:  Sanganagouda Patil; Abhay M Nene
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The Mechanical Effect of Rod Contouring on Rod-Screw System Strength in Spine Fixation.

Authors:  Nihat Acar; Ahmet Karakasli; Ahmet A Karaarslan; Mehmet Hilal Ozcanhan; Fatih Ertem; Mehmet Erduran
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-09-08

7.  Biomechanical comparison between titanium and cobalt chromium rods used in a pedicle subtraction osteotomy model.

Authors:  Kalpit N Shah; Gregory Walker; Sarath C Koruprolu; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2018-03-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.