Literature DB >> 11305084

Bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound parameters in patients with Klinefelter's syndrome after long-term testosterone substitution.

J P van den Bergh1, A R Hermus, A I Spruyt, C G Sweep, F H Corstens, A G Smals.   

Abstract

Klinefelter's syndrome (KS) is a common sex chromosomal disorder associated with androgen deficiency and osteoporosis. Only few bone mineral density (BMD) and no quantitative ultrasound (QUS) data are available in these patients after long-term testosterone replacement therapy. We examined in a cross-sectional study 52 chromatin-positive KS patients aged 39.1 +/- 12.4 years (mean +/- SD). Patients had been treated with oral or parenteral androgens for 9.2 +/- 8.2 years (range 1-32 years). Areal BMD and bone mineral apparent density (BMAD, i.e., estimated volumetric BMD) at the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck were determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. BMD T-scores in the patient group were calculated based on three different North American reference databases. The QUS parameters broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) were measured at the calcaneus using an ultrasound imaging device (UBIS 3000) and were compared with QUS results in a sex-, age- and height-matched control group. QUS T-scores were calculated based on the results of QUS measurements in 50 normal Dutch men between the ages of 20 and 30 years. QUS and BMD results in the KS patient group were compared. Overall, based on the three reference databases, 46% and 63% of the KS patients had a T-score between -1 and -2.5 and a further 10% and 14% had a T-score < or = -2.5 at the total hip and/or lumbar spine, as measured by areal BMD or BMAD, respectively. Thirty-nine percent of the KS patients had a T-score between -2.5 and -1, while 2% had a T-score < or = -2.5 for BUA and/or SOS. BUA (77.7 +/- 15.0 dB/MHz) and SOS (1518.8 +/- 36.5 m/s) were significantly lower in the KS patients than in age- and height-matched controls (87.1 +/- 17.8 dB/MHz, p < 0.005, and 1536.5 +/- 42.5 m/s, p < 0.05). Correlation coefficients between the QUS parameters and areal BMD (0.28 to 0.37) or BMAD (0.27 to 0.46) were modest. ROC analysis showed that discrimination of a BMD or BMAD T-score < or = -2.5 with either BUA or SOS was not statistically significant. Although a limitation of our study is that direct comparison of BMD and QUS T-scores is not possible because in the control group in which QUS parameters were determined no BMD measurements were performed, we conclude that despite long-term testosterone replacement therapy, a considerable percentage of patients with KS had a BMD T-score < -1 or even < or = -2.5, based on different North American reference databases. This percentage was even higher for BMAD. QUS parameters were also low in the KS patient group when compared with Dutch control subjects. QUS parameters cannot be used to predict BMD or BMAD in KS patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11305084     DOI: 10.1007/s001980170158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  19 in total

Review 1.  Surgical recovery of sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Tomomoto Ishikawa
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Bone mineral density in Klinefelter syndrome is reduced and primarily determined by muscle strength and resorptive markers, but not directly by testosterone.

Authors:  A Bojesen; N Birkebæk; K Kristensen; L Heickendorff; L Mosekilde; J S Christiansen; C H Gravholt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Consensus statement on diagnosis and clinical management of Klinefelter syndrome.

Authors:  A F Radicioni; A Ferlin; G Balercia; D Pasquali; L Vignozzi; M Maggi; C Foresta; A Lenzi
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 4.  Morbidity in Klinefelter syndrome and the effect of testosterone treatment.

Authors:  Simon Chang; Anne Skakkebaek; Shanlee M Davis; Claus H Gravholt
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 5.  The use of ultrasound in the assessment of bone status.

Authors:  S Gonnelli; C Cepollaro
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Role of vitamin D levels and vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density in Klinefelter syndrome.

Authors:  A Ferlin; R Selice; A Di Mambro; M Ghezzi; A Di Nisio; N Caretta; C Foresta
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Genome-wide site-specific differential methylation in the blood of individuals with Klinefelter syndrome.

Authors:  Emily S Wan; Weiliang Qiu; Jarrett Morrow; Terri H Beaty; Jacqueline Hetmanski; Barry J Make; David A Lomas; Edwin K Silverman; Dawn L DeMeo
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 2.609

Review 8.  Androgens and bone.

Authors:  Bart L Clarke; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 2.668

9.  Long-term effect of testosterone replacement therapy on bone in hypogonadal men with Klinefelter Syndrome.

Authors:  N Tahani; L Nieddu; G Prossomariti; M Spaziani; S Granato; F Carlomagno; A Anzuini; A Lenzi; A F Radicioni; E Romagnoli
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.633

10.  Genetic and hormonal control of bone volume, architecture, and remodeling in XXY mice.

Authors:  Peter Y Liu; Robert Kalak; Yanhe Lue; Yue Jia; Krista Erkkila; Hong Zhou; Markus J Seibel; Christina Wang; Ronald S Swerdloff; Colin R Dunstan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.