Literature DB >> 11304859

Gynecologists' patterns of prescribing pessaries.

E Pott-Grinstein1, J R Newcomer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine how gynecologists in the United States prescribe pessaries. STUDY
DESIGN: A 34-question (long) survey was sent to 2,000 gynecologists. Those who did not respond were then sent a five-question (short) survey.
RESULTS: Nine hundred forty-seven (47.3%) long and short questionnaires were returned. Eighty-six percent of gynecologists prescribe pessaries. Most received minimal or no training in pessaries in their residencies. The most common pessaries used were the ring and doughnut. Uterine prolapse was treated most often with the Gellhorn and doughnut pessaries. The cube and Gellhorn pessaries were thought to be the most effective for vaginal vault prolapse. The Gehrung and ring pessaries were thought to be most effective for correction of cystocele. However, the ring pessary was considered the easiest to use. Follow-up visits were most often performed at one week, one month and then every three months. Estrogen was used in most cases.
CONCLUSION: Most gynecologists prescribe pessaries. The ring pessary is used most often and is deemed the easiest to use. Pessaries are thought to work for all pelvic organ prolapse defects but are thought to be less effective for posterior defects. Follow-up of patients differs from manufacturers' recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11304859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  31 in total

Review 1.  Management of genital prolapse.

Authors:  Ranee Thakar; Stuart Stanton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-25

Review 2.  An integrative review and severity classification of complications related to pessary use in the treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Marwa Abdulaziz; Lynn Stothers; Darren Lazare; Andrew Macnab
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Management of apical pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Alexandriah N Alas; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Management of recurrent vault prolapse.

Authors:  V V Toh; V Bogne; A Bako
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery practice patterns: IUGA member survey.

Authors:  Gamal Ghoniem; Jessica Hammett
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Pessaries (mechanical devices) for pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Carol Bugge; Elisabeth J Adams; Deepa Gopinath; Fiona Reid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

7.  The Association Between Distances Traveled for Care and Treatment Choices for Pelvic Floor Disorders in a Rural Southwestern Population.

Authors:  Gena C Dunivan; Pamela S Fairchild; Sara B Cichowski; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  J Health Dispar Res Pract       Date:  2014

8.  Vaginal pessaries in managing women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: patient characteristics and factors contributing to success.

Authors:  Lesley-Ann M Hanson; Jane A Schulz; Catherine G Flood; Bonita Cooley; Florence Tam
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-07-26

9.  Discontinuation rate and adverse events after 1 year of vaginal pessary use in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Theerarat Yimphong; Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan; Pranom Buppasiri; Chompilas Chongsomchai; Supparaluck Kanchaiyaphum
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Survey of the characteristics and satisfaction degree of the patients using a pessary.

Authors:  Sang Wook Bai; Bo Sung Yoon; Ja Young Kwon; Jong Seung Shin; Sei Kwang Kim; Ki Hyun Park
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.