| Literature DB >> 11304719 |
W K Cheung1, J Natarajan, M Sanders, E Vercammen.
Abstract
This report summarizes the results of two double-blind, single-center, randomized studies that used a two-period crossover design. The objective of these two studies was to compare the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pain score at the subcutaneous (sc) injection site of a phosphate-buffered recombinant human erythropoietin (EPREX, epoetin alfa, r-HuEPO) formulated with a new stabilizer (glycine and Polysorbate 80) with the commercially available EPREX formulations, which uses human serum albumin (HSA) as the stabilizer. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers were enrolled in each of the two studies. In the first study, subjects received a single 150 IU/kg sc dose of r-HuEPO using the 2000 IU/mL (2K) phosphate-buffered formulation with or without the new stabilizer (12 subjects/group). In the second study, subjects received a single 750 IU/kg sc dose of r-HuEPO using the 40 000 IU/mL (40K) phosphate-buffered formulation with or without the new stabilizer (12 subjects/group). In each study, r-HuEPO was administered over two separate dosing periods, each separated with a 28-day washout period. There were no significant differences in AUC and C(max) for either strength of r-HuEPO formulated with or without the new stabilizer, indicating that the absorption and disposition characteristics of the two formulations were similar after sc administration. Both r-HuEPO strengths with and without the new stabilizer were safe and well tolerated; the safety and tolerability profiles of both formulations for each r-HuEPO concentration were comparable. There were no statistically significant differences in pain score for either strength of r-HuEPO with and without the new stabilizer. It was concluded that the two phosphate-buffered r-HuEPO concentrations formulated with and without the new stabilizer are pharmacokinetically equivalent. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2000 PMID: 11304719 DOI: 10.1002/bdd.231
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biopharm Drug Dispos ISSN: 0142-2782 Impact factor: 1.627