Literature DB >> 11304008

Perceptual completion in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and pigeons (Columbia livia).

K Fujita1.   

Abstract

In a two-dimensional drawing, when the narrow edge of a bar appears to touch the edge of a large rectangle, humans overestimate the length of the bar (Kanizsa, 1979). Kanizsa has suggested that this illusion occurs because humans perceive the bar as continuing behind the rectangle and complete the "occluded" portion of the bar. Rhesus monkeys and pigeons were trained to classify black target bars with a variety of lengths as "long" or "short." In training, the bar was always located at the same distance from a gray box. After learning this discrimination, the subjects were tested on novel stimuli, in which the bar was located at three new locations. Monkeys showed a consistent response bias for "long" when the bar touched the box, but pigeons did not. Monkeys appear to have completed the "occluded" part like humans, whereas pigeons failed to do so. Because this procedure does not require animals to complete the "occluded" part with any particular form, their failure suggests that pigeons do not even perceive the target bar as continuing behind the "occluding" figure. The failure of pigeons may be due to difficulty in perceiving depth from two-dimensional drawings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11304008     DOI: 10.3758/bf03200507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  9 in total

1.  Global visual processing in macaques studied using Kanizsa illusory shapes.

Authors:  Kimberly A Feltner; Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Spatial short-term memory assists in maintaining occluded objects.

Authors:  Hyunkyu Lee; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

3.  Amodal completion by baboons (Papio papio): contribution of background depth cues.

Authors:  Joël Fagot; Isabelle Barbet; Carole Parron; Christine Deruelle
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 2.163

4.  Development of object concepts in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Cynthia Hall-Haro; Scott P Johnson; Tracy A Price; Jayme A Vance; Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.038

5.  Amodal completion of moving objects by pigeons.

Authors:  Yasuo Nagasaka; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Experimental Divergences in the Visual Cognition of Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2015

7.  Monkeys show recognition without priming in a classification task.

Authors:  Benjamin M Basile; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Pacman in the sky with shadows: the effect of cast shadows on the perceptual completion of occluded figures by chimpanzees and humans.

Authors:  Masaki Tomonaga; Tomoko Imura
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.759

9.  Are animals autistic savants.

Authors:  Giorgio Vallortigara; Allan Snyder; Gisela Kaplan; Patrick Bateson; Nicola S Clayton; Lesley J Rogers
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 8.029

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.