J S Bradley1, A Arrieta. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of San Diego, CA 92123, USA. jbradley@chsd.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: These studies were designed to assess the efficacy and safety of cefepime, a fourth generation cephalosporin, for the treatment of serious infections, including lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in children. METHODS: Four clinical trials of cefepime for the treatment of serious bacterial infections enrolled 259 children with LRTI. In 3 trials cefepime was compared with ceftazidime (n = 166), cefotaxime (n = 16) or cefuroxime (n = 12). One trial was noncomparative (n = 65). RESULTS: Treatment with cefepime 50 mg/kg/ dose administered every 8 to 12 h produced a satisfactory clinical response (clinical signs of infection resolved or improved with no evidence of recurrent infection at posttreatment follow-up) in 88 to 100% of patients, comparable with comparator therapy. In children from whom a causative pathogen was identified, bacteriologic eradication was comparable between cefepime and comparator therapy. Cefepime was as safe and well-tolerated as comparator therapy. Few treatment-related clinical or laboratory adverse events were noted and were equivalent to comparator in all studies. CONCLUSION: Cefepime is as effective, safe and well-tolerated for the empiric treatment of children with LRTI as comparator agents but offers the advantage of an enhanced spectrum of activity for Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens compared with second or third generation cephalosporins.
BACKGROUND: These studies were designed to assess the efficacy and safety of cefepime, a fourth generation cephalosporin, for the treatment of serious infections, including lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in children. METHODS: Four clinical trials of cefepime for the treatment of serious bacterial infections enrolled 259 children with LRTI. In 3 trials cefepime was compared with ceftazidime (n = 166), cefotaxime (n = 16) or cefuroxime (n = 12). One trial was noncomparative (n = 65). RESULTS: Treatment with cefepime 50 mg/kg/ dose administered every 8 to 12 h produced a satisfactory clinical response (clinical signs of infection resolved or improved with no evidence of recurrent infection at posttreatment follow-up) in 88 to 100% of patients, comparable with comparator therapy. In children from whom a causative pathogen was identified, bacteriologic eradication was comparable between cefepime and comparator therapy. Cefepime was as safe and well-tolerated as comparator therapy. Few treatment-related clinical or laboratory adverse events were noted and were equivalent to comparator in all studies. CONCLUSION:Cefepime is as effective, safe and well-tolerated for the empiric treatment of children with LRTI as comparator agents but offers the advantage of an enhanced spectrum of activity for Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens compared with second or third generation cephalosporins.
Authors: Kensuke Shoji; John S Bradley; Michael D Reed; John N van den Anker; Christine Domonoske; Edmund V Capparelli Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-03-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Christopher J Arnold; Jessica Ericson; Nathan Cho; James Tian; Shelby Wilson; Vivian H Chu; Christoph P Hornik; Reese H Clark; Daniel K Benjamin; P Brian Smith Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 3.806