Literature DB >> 11303006

Cost effectiveness of ramipril treatment for cardiovascular risk reduction.

I S Malik1, V K Bhatia, J S Kooner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost effectiveness of ramipril treatment in patients at low, medium, and high risk of cardiovascular death.
DESIGN: Population based cost effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the health care provider in the UK. Effectiveness was modelled using data from the HOPE (heart outcome prevention evaluation) trial. The life table method was used to predict mortality in a medium risk cohort, as in the HOPE trial (2.44% annual mortality), and in low and high risk groups (1% and 4.5% annual mortality, respectively).
SETTING: UK population using 1998 government actuary department data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cost per life year gained at five years and lifetime treatment with ramipril.
RESULTS: Cost effectiveness was pound36 600, pound13 600, and pound4000 per life year gained at five years and pound5300, pound1900, and pound100 per life year gained at 20 years (lifetime treatment) in low, medium, and high risk groups, respectively. Cost effectiveness at 20 years remained well below that of haemodialysis ( pound25 000 per life year gained) over a range of potential drug costs and savings. Treatment of the HOPE population would cost the UK National Health Service (NHS) an additional pound360 million but would prevent 12 000 deaths per annum.
CONCLUSIONS: Ramipril is cost effective treatment for cardiovascular risk reduction in patients at medium, high, and low pretreatment risk, with a cost effectiveness comparable with the use of statins. Implementation of ramipril treatment in a medium risk population would result in a major reduction in cardiovascular deaths but would increase annual NHS spending by pound360 million.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11303006      PMCID: PMC1729730          DOI: 10.1136/heart.85.5.539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  17 in total

1.  Cost effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) treatment related to the risk of coronary heart disease and cost of drug treatment.

Authors:  D M Pickin; C J McCabe; L E Ramsay; N Payne; I U Haq; W W Yeo; P R Jackson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients.

Authors:  S Yusuf; P Sleight; J Pogue; J Bosch; R Davies; G Dagenais
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Some guidelines on the use of cost effectiveness league tables.

Authors:  J Mason; M Drummond; G Torrance
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-02-27

4.  Follow-up study of patients randomly allocated ramipril or placebo for heart failure after acute myocardial infarction: AIRE Extension (AIREX) Study. Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy.

Authors:  A S Hall; G D Murray; S G Ball
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-05-24       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Lipid-lowering for prevention of coronary heart disease: what policy now?

Authors:  I Ul Haq; L E Ramsay; D M Pickin; W W Yeo; P R Jackson; J N Payne
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.124

6.  Cost effectiveness in the treatment of heart failure with ramipril. A Swedish substudy of the AIRE study. Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy.

Authors:  L Erhardt; S Ball; F Andersson; P Bergentoft; C Martinez
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators.

Authors:  F M Sacks; M A Pfeffer; L A Moye; J L Rouleau; J D Rutherford; T G Cole; L Brown; J W Warnica; J M Arnold; C C Wun; B R Davis; E Braunwald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-10-03       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Cost-effectiveness of cholesterol lowering. Results from the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)

Authors:  B Jönsson; M Johannesson; J Kjekshus; A G Olsson; T R Pedersen; H Wedel
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Effects of captopril on ischemic events after myocardial infarction. Results of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement trial. SAVE Investigators.

Authors:  J D Rutherford; M A Pfeffer; L A Moyé; B R Davis; G C Flaker; P R Kowey; G A Lamas; H S Miller; M Packer; J L Rouleau
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  J Shepherd; S M Cobbe; I Ford; C G Isles; A R Lorimer; P W MacFarlane; J H McKillop; C J Packard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-11-16       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  12 in total

1.  Docetaxel induced cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  M Shimoyama; Y Murata; K I Sumi; R Hamazoe; I Komuro
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Strong prognostic value of combining N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide and ECG to predict death in heart patients from general practice.

Authors:  O W Nielsen; J Hilden; J F Hansen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Implementation of the NICE guidelines for the primary prevention of mortality from ventricular tachyarrhythmias: implications for UK electrophysiology centres; activity modelling from the UK-HEART study.

Authors:  N P Gall; M T Kearney; A Zaman; S O'Nunain; K A Fox; A Flapan; J Nolan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Renin angiotensin system inhibition is associated with reduced free radical concentrations in arteries of patients with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  C Berry; N Anderson; A J Kirk; A F Dominiczak; J J McMurray
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  More than just hype.

Authors:  Salim Yusuf; Gilles Dagenais
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Cost effectiveness of ramipril in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events : economic evaluation of the HOPE (Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation) study for Germany from the Statutory Health Insurance perspective.

Authors:  Peter K Schädlich; Josef Georg Brecht; Badrudin Rangoonwala; Eduard Huppertz
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Ramipril: a review of its use in the prevention of cardiovascular outcomes.

Authors:  Gregory T Warner; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Determining the cost-effectiveness of preventing cardiovascular disease: are estimates calculated over the duration of a clinical trial adequate?

Authors:  Steven A Grover; Louis Coupal; Ilka Lowensteyn
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  Cost-effectiveness of zofenopril in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction: a post hoc analysis of SMILE-4.

Authors:  Claudio Borghi; Ettore Ambrosioni; Stefano Omboni; Arrigo Fg Cicero; Stefano Bacchelli; Daniela Degli Esposti; Salvatore Novo; Dragos Vinereanu; Giuseppe Ambrosio; Giorgio Reggiardo; Dario Zava
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-07-08

10.  Use of recommended medications after myocardial infarction in Austria.

Authors:  Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Anna E Bucsics; Alexandra Schautzer; Peter Wieninger; Michaela Pogantsch
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 8.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.