Literature DB >> 11302693

Heterochromatin is not an adequate explanation for close proximity of interphase chromosomes 1--Y, 9--Y, and 16--Y in human spermatozoa.

N Tilgen1, M Guttenbach, M Schmid.   

Abstract

Analysis of human spermatozoa and lymphocytes using C-banding techniques and in situ hybridization has shown a higher order packaging of the human genome. Chromosomes are not distributed entirely at random within the nucleus. In particular, chromosomes 1, 9, and 16, carrying large blocks of pericentromeric heterochromatin, and the Y chromosome, carrying heterochromatin in Yq12, are in close proximity to each other within the nucleus and are involved in somatic pairing with nonhomologous chromosomes. In order to determine whether the close proximity of these chromosomes in any way is attributable to the distribution of heterochromatin, double in situ hybridization was performed on chromosomes 1--Y, 9--Y, and 16--Y as well as on 1--X, 9--X, and 16--X-with chromosome X as the other gonosome carrying less heterochromatin-in human spermatozoa. Each pair was found to have a nonrandom spatial distribution. However, comparison of the arrangement of chromosomes 1--Y versus 1--X and 9--Y versus 9--X revealed that heterochromatin cannot be the only cause for the tendency of chromosome fusion, because only the results of the chromosome pair 1--Y/1--X could support this proposition. In conclusion, the heterochromatin effect cannot be, in itself, an adequate explanation for chromosome association, implicating as well other mechanisms. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11302693     DOI: 10.1006/excr.2001.5193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Cell Res        ISSN: 0014-4827            Impact factor:   3.905


  9 in total

1.  Non-random positioning of chromosomes in human sperm nuclei.

Authors:  Irina A Zalenskaya; Andrei O Zalensky
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Chromosome architecture in the decondensing human sperm nucleus.

Authors:  Olga Mudrak; Nikolai Tomilin; Andrei Zalensky
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Interindividual differences and alterations in the topology of chromosomes in human sperm nuclei of fertile donors and carriers of reciprocal translocations.

Authors:  Ewa Wiland; Marta Zegało; Maciej Kurpisz
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Hierarchical radial and polar organisation of chromosomes in human sperm.

Authors:  N M Millan; P Lau; M Hann; D Ioannou; D Hoffman; M Barrionuevo; W Maxson; S Ory; H G Tempest
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Kinetics of human male pronuclear development in a heterologous ICSI model.

Authors:  Estella L Jones; Olga Mudrak; Andrei O Zalensky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Positioning of chromosome 15, 18, X and Y centromeres in sperm cells of fertile individuals and infertile patients with increased level of aneuploidy.

Authors:  Marta Olszewska; Ewa Wiland; Maciej Kurpisz
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Nuclear organisation of sperm remains remarkably unaffected in the presence of defective spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Dimitris Ioannou; Eric J Meershoek; Dimitra Christopikou; Michael Ellis; Alan R Thornhill; Darren Karl Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Nuclear Integrity but Not Topology of Mouse Sperm Chromosome is Affected by Oxidative DNA Damage.

Authors:  Alexandre Champroux; Christelle Damon-Soubeyrand; Chantal Goubely; Stephanie Bravard; Joelle Henry-Berger; Rachel Guiton; Fabrice Saez; Joel Drevet; Ayhan Kocer
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  Chromosome (re)positioning in spermatozoa of fathers and sons - carriers of reciprocal chromosome translocation (RCT).

Authors:  Marta Olszewska; Ewa Wiland; Nataliya Huleyuk; Monika Fraczek; Alina T Midro; Danuta Zastavna; Maciej Kurpisz
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.063

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.