Literature DB >> 11302594

An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of maxillary first and second premolar extraction effects.

H B Ong1, M G Woods.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine dimensional changes in the maxillary arch following the extractions of maxillary first or second premolars. Pre- and posttreatment records of 71 patients treated by one experienced orthodontist were randomly selected from completed premolar extraction cases. Forty-five patients involved the extraction of maxillary first premolars; of these, 15 also had extractions of mandibular first premolars and 30 had extractions of mandibular second premolars. Twenty-six patients involved the extraction of maxillary second premolars, and all of these also had extractions of mandibular second premolars. Pretreatment factors that seemed to suggest a basis for the extraction choice in this sample included incisal overjet, molar relationship, and maxillary incisor protrusion. Mean reductions with treatment in the anteroposterior arch dimension were similar within all premolar extraction groups. There was evidence of greater mean maxillary intermolar-width reduction following the extractions of maxillary second premolars than following extractions of maxillary first premolars. Greater mean maxillary incisor retraction was found in the maxillary first premolar extraction group than in the maxillary second premolar group. A wide range of individual variation in incisor and molar changes did, however, accompany treatment involving both maxillary premolar extraction sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11302594     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071<0090:AOACAO>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  20 in total

1.  The maxillary arch and its relationship to cephalometric landmarks of selected malay ethnic group.

Authors:  Khin Myo Thu; Than Winn; Nizam Abdullah; J A P Jayasinghe; G L Chandima
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2005-01

2.  The effect of premolar extractions on incisor position and soft tissue profile in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion.

Authors:  Catharina Weyrich; Jörg A Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Short-term effects of systematic premolar extraction on lip profile, vertical dimension and cephalometric parameters in borderline patients for extraction therapy--a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Christian Kirschneck; Peter Proff; Claudia Reicheneder; Carsten Lippold
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  A comparison of second premolar extraction and mini-implant total arch distalization with interproximal stripping.

Authors:  Min-Ho Jung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Vertical gingival display changes associated with upper premolars extraction orthodontic treatment: A prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Michel F Fallas; Elham S Abu-Alhaija; Susan N Alkhateeb; Shadi S Samawi
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-11-01

6.  Second premolar extraction: Not always a second choice.

Authors:  Rohan Mascarenhas; Parag Majithia; Shahista Parveen
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

7.  First premolar extraction effects on upper airway dimension in bimaxillary proclination patients.

Authors:  Emad Al Maaitah; Nizar El Said; E S Abu Alhaija
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  CBCT evaluation of root canal morphology and anatomical relationship of root of maxillary second premolar to maxillary sinus in a western Chinese population.

Authors:  Yujia Yan; JingLin Li; Hualing Zhu; Jun Liu; Jiayin Ren; Ling Zou
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Preliminary three-dimensional analysis of tooth movement and arch dimension change of the maxillary dentition in Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with first premolar extraction: conventional anchorage vs. mini-implant anchorage.

Authors:  Heon-Mook Park; Byoung-Ho Kim; Il-Hyung Yang; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Optimizing anterior en masse retraction with miniscrew anchorage.

Authors:  Pavankumar Janardan Vibhute
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2011-07-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.