Literature DB >> 11302555

Phase response curves of a molecular model oscillator: implications for mutual coupling of paired oscillators.

B Petri1, M Stengl.   

Abstract

Increasing evidence indicates that the accessory medulla is the circadian pacemaker controlling locomotor activity rhythms in insects. A prominent group of neurons of this neuropil shows immunoreactivity to the peptide pigment-dispersing hormone (PDH). In Drosophila melanogaster, the PDH-immunoreactive (PDH-ir) lateral neurons, which also express the clock genes period and timeless, are assumed to be circadian pacemaker cells themselves. In other insects, such as Leucophaea maderae, a subset of apparently homologue PDH-ir cells is a candidate for the circadian coupling pathway of the bilaterally symmetric clocks. Although knowledge about molecular mechanisms of the circadian clockwork is increasing rapidly, very little is known about mechanisms of circadian coupling. The authors used a computer model, based on the molecular feedback loop of the clock genes in D. melanogaster, to test the hypothesis that release of PDH is involved in the coupling between bilaterally paired oscillators. They can show that a combination of all-delay- and all-advance-type interactions between two model oscillators matches best the experimental findings on mutual pacemaker coupling in L. maderae. The model predicts that PDH affects the phosphorylation rate of clock genes and that in addition to PDH, another neuroactive substance is involved in the coupling pathway, via an all-advance type of interaction. The model suggests that PDH and light pulses, represented by two distinct classes of phase response curves, have different targets in the oscillatory feedback loop and are, therefore, likely to act in separate input pathways to the clock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11302555     DOI: 10.1177/074873001129001836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Rhythms        ISSN: 0748-7304            Impact factor:   3.182


  6 in total

Review 1.  The circadian clock in the brain: a structural and functional comparison between mammals and insects.

Authors:  Charlotte Helfrich-Förster
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Extracellular long-term recordings of the isolated accessory medulla, the circadian pacemaker center of the cockroach Leucophaea maderae, reveal ultradian and hint circadian rhythms.

Authors:  Nils-Lasse Schneider; Monika Stengl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Stochastic simulation of delay-induced circadian rhythms in Drosophila.

Authors:  Zhouyi Xu; Xiaodong Cai
Journal:  EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol       Date:  2009-07-19

4.  Circadian pacemaker coupling by multi-peptidergic neurons in the cockroach Leucophaea maderae.

Authors:  Sandra Soehler; Monika Stengl; Thomas Reischig
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 5.249

5.  A molecular model for intercellular synchronization in the mammalian circadian clock.

Authors:  Tsz-Leung To; Michael A Henson; Erik D Herzog; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  An effective model of endogenous clocks and external stimuli determining circadian rhythms.

Authors:  Tim Breitenbach; Charlotte Helfrich-Förster; Thomas Dandekar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.