Literature DB >> 11302034

A survey of student assessment in U.S. medical schools: the balance of breadth versus fidelity.

B E Mavis1, B L Cole, R B Hoppe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Faced with the challenge to develop models of assessment relevant to work of physicians, medical schools have broadened their assessment of medical student competency.
PURPOSE: U.S. medical schools were surveyed to determine the extent to which student assessments have broadened beyond multiple-choice question (MCQ) examinations and preceptor ratings.
METHODS: A survey mailed to 126 accredited U.S. medical schools asked respondents to indicate the frequency with which a variety of assessment methods were used in each year of the curriculum.
RESULTS: Examinations dominated preclinical assessments. Year 3 relied heavily on faculty ratings, live observations, and MCQs. Preceptor ratings were used most in year 4.
CONCLUSIONS: A variety of competency assessments currently are used; MCQs remain a core assessment method. Year 3 had the greatest breadth of assessment strategies. The findings suggest that educators continue to be challenged to balance the breadth of competencies sampled with the fidelity of the assessment experience.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11302034     DOI: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1302_1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Teach Learn Med        ISSN: 1040-1334            Impact factor:   2.414


  4 in total

1.  A multi-institutional survey on faculty development needs, priorities and preferences in medical education in an Asian medical school.

Authors:  Zubair Amin; Khoo Hoon Eng; Chong Yap Seng; Tan Chay Hoon; Goh Poh Sun; Dujeepa D Samarasekera; Chan Yiong Huak; Koh Dow Rhoon
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2009-09-23

2.  Improving the National Board of Medical Examiners internal Medicine Subject Exam for use in clerkship evaluation.

Authors:  D Michael Elnicki; Dianne A Lescisin; Susan Case
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  A pilot survey of student perceptions on the benefit of the OSCE and MCQ modalities.

Authors:  Stefan Müller; Utz Settmacher; Ines Koch; Uta Dahmen
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2018-11-15

4.  Training Medical Students to Create and Collaboratively Review Multiple-Choice Questions: A Comprehensive Workshop.

Authors:  Josh Kurtz; Beth Holman; Seetha U Monrad
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2020-10-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.