Literature DB >> 11301545

Précis of Simple heuristics that make us smart.

P M Todd1, G Gigerenzer.   

Abstract

How can anyone be rational in a world where knowledge is limited, time is pressing, and deep thought is often an unattainable luxury? Traditional models of unbounded rationality and optimization in cognitive science, economics, and animal behavior have tended to view decision-makers as possessing supernatural powers of reason, limitless knowledge, and endless time. But understanding decisions in the real world requires a more psychologically plausible notion of bounded rationality. In Simple heuristics that make us smart (Gigerenzer et al. 1999), we explore fast and frugal heuristics--simple rules in the mind's adaptive toolbox for making decisions with realistic mental resources. These heuristics can enable both living organisms and artificial systems to make smart choices quickly and with a minimum of information by exploiting the way that information is structured in particular environments. In this précis, we show how simple building blocks that control information search, stop search, and make decisions can be put together to form classes of heuristics, including: ignorance-based and one-reason decision making for choice, elimination models for categorization, and satisficing heuristics for sequential search. These simple heuristics perform comparably to more complex algorithms, particularly when generalizing to new data--that is, simplicity leads to robustness. We present evidence regarding when people use simple heuristics and describe the challenges to be addressed by this research program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11301545     DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x00003447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Sci        ISSN: 0140-525X            Impact factor:   12.579


  98 in total

1.  The empirical characteristics of human pattern vision defy theoretically-driven expectations.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  A general approach for population games with application to vaccination.

Authors:  Timothy C Reluga; Alison P Galvani
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.144

3.  Evidence accumulation in decision making: unifying the "take the best" and the "rational" models.

Authors:  Michael D Lee; Tarrant D R Cummins
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

4.  Perceptions of risk may explain the discrepancy between patient and clinician-recorded symptoms.

Authors:  Ian Dawson; Victoria Senior; Simon de Lusignan
Journal:  Prim Care Respir J       Date:  2012-06

5.  On the coevolution of social responsiveness and behavioural consistency.

Authors:  Max Wolf; G Sander Van Doorn; Franz J Weissing
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Conceptual layers and strategies in tour planning.

Authors:  Thora Tenbrink; Inessa Seifert
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-10-13

7.  Integrating Decision Making and Mental Health Interventions Research: Research Directions.

Authors:  Celia E Wills; Margaret Holmes-Rovner
Journal:  Clin Psychol (New York)       Date:  2006

8.  [A complex process: decision-making in general practice: 117 structured case analyses].

Authors:  Uta-Maria Waldmann; Markus Gulich; Ursula Stabenow; Hans-Peter Zeitler
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2006-12

9.  Increased sensitivity to differentially diagnostic answers using familiar materials: implications for confirmation bias.

Authors:  Craig R M McKenzie
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

10.  A cognitive task analysis of information management strategies in a computerized provider order entry environment.

Authors:  Charlene R Weir; Jonathan J R Nebeker; Bret L Hicken; Rebecca Campo; Frank Drews; Beth Lebar
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.