Literature DB >> 11301341

Comparison of the WHO/ISUP classification and cytokeratin 20 expression in predicting the behavior of low-grade papillary urothelial tumors. World/Health Organization/Internattional Society of Urologic Pathology.

A Alsheikh1, Z Mohamedali, E Jones, J Masterson, C B Gilks.   

Abstract

It has not been possible to identify those low-grade papillary transitional cell bladder tumors that will recur based on conventional histopathologic assessment. Both the new World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathology (WHO/ISUP) classification of transitional cell papillary neoplasms and the pattern of tumor cytokeratin 20 (CK20) immunostaining have been suggested as means of improving prognostication in low-grade transitional cell tumors. Forty-nine low-grade, noninvasive papillary transitional cell tumors were identified for the period between 1984 and 1993. The recently described WHO/ISUP classification was applied, and the tumors were classified histologically as papilloma, papillary neoplasm of low malignant potential (LMP) or low-grade papillary carcinoma. After CK20 immunostaining, the expression pattern in the tumor was classified as normal (superficial) or abnormal. Of 49 tumors, 20 were classified as papillary neoplasms of LMP and five of these patients (25%) experienced a recurrence. Of 29 tumors classified as low-grade papillary carcinoma, 14 (48.2%) recurred. In 46 of 49 cases, the CK20 immunostaining could be evaluated. Sixteen tumors showed normal (superficial) pattern of CK20 expression, and four (25%) of these patients experienced a recurrence. In contrast, of 30 patients with abnormal CK20 staining of their tumors, 15 (50%) patients had one or more recurrences. In this study, papillary neoplasms of LMP (as per the WHO/ISUP classification system) had a lower recurrence rate than low-grade papillary transitional cell carcinoma. Similarly low-grade urothelial tumors showing a normal CK20 expression pattern recurred less frequently than tumors with an abnormal pattern of CK20 staining. Neither of these differences was statistically significant, and recurrences were observed in 20% of patients whose tumors were both classified as papillary neoplasms of LMP and showed normal CK20 immunostaining; thus they do not allow a change in our current management of patients with low-grade papillary urothelial tumors, with close follow-up for all patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11301341     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3880300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  23 in total

Review 1.  Classification and grading of the non-invasive urothelial neoplasms: recent advances and controversies.

Authors:  R Montironi; A Lopez-Beltran; R Mazzucchelli; D G Bostwick
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Karyometry detects subvisual differences in chromatin organisation state between non-recurrent and recurrent papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential.

Authors:  M Scarpelli; R Montironi; L M Tarquini; P W Hamilton; A López Beltran; J Ranger-Moore; P H Bartels
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  In stage pT1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), high KRT20 and low KRT5 mRNA expression identify the luminal subtype and predict recurrence and survival.

Authors:  Johannes Breyer; Ralph M Wirtz; Wolfgang Otto; Philipp Erben; Maximilian C Kriegmair; Robert Stoehr; Markus Eckstein; Sebastian Eidt; Stefan Denzinger; Maximilian Burger; Arndt Hartmann
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Urothelial neoplasms in pediatric and young adult patients: A large single-center series.

Authors:  James A Saltsman; Marcus M Malek; Victor E Reuter; William J Hammond; Enrico Danzer; Harry W Herr; Michael P LaQuaglia
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Automatic segmentation of cell nuclei in bladder and skin tissue for karyometric analysis.

Authors:  Vrushali R Korde; Hubert Bartels; Jennifer Barton; James Ranger-Moore
Journal:  Anal Quant Cytol Histol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.302

6.  Prognostic value of keratin subtyping in transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  Cord Langner; Beate J Wegscheider; Peter Rehak; Manfred Ratschek; Richard Zigeuner
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2004-09-18       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Mixed low- and high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma: histopathogenetic and clinical significance.

Authors:  Kien T Mai; Trevor A Flood; Phillip Williams; Zuzana Kos; Eric C Belanger
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Colon cancer with isolated metastasis to the kidney at the time of initial diagnosis.

Authors:  Gorkem Aksu; Merdan Fayda; Burak Sakar; Yersu Kapran
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2003

9.  Reproducibility of the 1998 World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathology classification of papillary urothelial neoplasms of the urinary bladder.

Authors:  Kutsal Yorukoglu; Burcin Tuna; Emel Dikicioglu; Ender Duzcan; Aydin Isisag; Sait Sen; Ugur Mungan; Ziya Kirkali
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Utility of a dual immunostain cocktail comprising of p53 and CK20 to aid in the diagnosis of non-neoplastic and neoplastic bladder biopsies.

Authors:  Isil Z Yildiz; Rosemary Recavarren; Henry B Armah; Sheldon Bastacky; Rajiv Dhir; Anil V Parwani
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 2.644

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.