Literature DB >> 11301137

How strong is natural selection?

J K. Conner.   

Abstract

The strength of selection in nature has long been a controversial subject, partly because there were few quantitative measurements of phenotypic selection available until recently. In a new paper, Kingsolver and colleagues reviewed 63 studies and found that the median standardized directional selection gradient (a measure of the strength of phenotypic selection) was 0.16. Whether this means selection in nature is strong or weak depends both on one's point of view and on the error in selection estimates.

Year:  2001        PMID: 11301137     DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02138-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  7 in total

1.  Pollinator-mediated natural selection in Penstemon digitalis.

Authors:  Amy Parachnowitsch; André Kessler
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2010-12-01

2.  The genetic mating system of a sea spider with male-biased sexual size dimorphism: evidence for paternity skew despite random mating success.

Authors:  Felipe S Barreto; John C Avise
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Variation in resource limitation of plant reproduction influences natural selection on floral traits of Asclepias syriaca.

Authors:  Christina M Caruso; Davin L D Remington; Kate E Ostergren
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Adaptive divergence despite strong genetic drift: genomic analysis of the evolutionary mechanisms causing genetic differentiation in the island fox (Urocyon littoralis).

Authors:  W Chris Funk; Robert E Lovich; Paul A Hohenlohe; Courtney A Hofman; Scott A Morrison; T Scott Sillett; Cameron K Ghalambor; Jesus E Maldonado; Torben C Rick; Mitch D Day; Nicholas R Polato; Sarah W Fitzpatrick; Timothy J Coonan; Kevin R Crooks; Adam Dillon; David K Garcelon; Julie L King; Christina L Boser; Nicholas Gould; William F Andelt
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Locus-specific genetic differentiation at Rw among warfarin-resistant rat (Rattus norvegicus) populations.

Authors:  Michael H Kohn; Hans-Joachim Pelz; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Temporal variation in selection on body length and date of return in a wild population of coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch.

Authors:  Miyako Kodama; Jeffrey J Hard; Kerry A Naish
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Extinction and the temporal distribution of macroevolutionary bursts.

Authors:  Stephen P De Lisle; David Punzalan; Njal Rollinson; Locke Rowe
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.