Literature DB >> 11301080

Multifocal pupillary light response fields in normal subjects and patients with visual field defects.

L Tan1, M Kondo, M Sato, N Kondo, Y Miyake.   

Abstract

The optimal conditions for recording focal pupillary light responses with a multifocal stimulation technique were determined, and the technique was applied to normal subjects and patients with visual field defects. Thirty-seven hexagonal stimuli were presented on a TV monitor with a visual field of 40 degrees diameter under a constant background illumination. Using a slow (4.7 Hz) m-sequence, reliable focal responses were obtained in both normal subjects and patients. The pupillary field and visual field were well correlated in patients with retinal diseases, but the correlation was not strong in patients with optic-nerve diseases. Pupillary light responses were reduced in the blind hemifield in patients with post-geniculate lesions. These results indicate that the multifocal stimulation technique can be used clinically to obtain a pupillary field for objective visual field testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11301080     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00030-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  [Current state of pupil-based diagnostics for glaucomatous optic neuropathy].

Authors:  K Skorkovská; U Schiefer; B Wilhelm; H Wilhelm
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Anisotropy in the peripheral visual field based on pupil response to the glare illusion.

Authors:  Novera Istiqomah; Yuta Suzuki; Yuya Kinzuka; Tetsuto Minami; Shigeki Nakauchi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-26

3.  Comparing multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) and multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP) in retinal diseases.

Authors:  Faran Sabeti; Andrew C James; Corinne F Carle; Rohan W Essex; Andrew Bell; Ted Maddess
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Chromatic Pupil Campimetry Reveals Functional Defects in Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Differences Related to Disease Activity.

Authors:  Carina Kelbsch; Jakob Lange; Helmut Wilhelm; Barbara Wilhelm; Tobias Peters; Melanie Kempf; Laura Kuehlewein; Krunoslav Stingl
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Comparison of unifocal, flicker, and multifocal pupil perimetry methods in healthy adults.

Authors:  Brendan L Portengen; Giorgio L Porro; Saskia M Imhof; Marnix Naber
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.004

6.  Cognitive and Ocular Factors Jointly Determine Pupil Responses under Equiluminance.

Authors:  Tomas Knapen; Jan Willem de Gee; Jan Brascamp; Stijn Nuiten; Sylco Hoppenbrouwers; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Gaze-Contingent Flicker Pupil Perimetry Detects Scotomas in Patients With Cerebral Visual Impairments or Glaucoma.

Authors:  Marnix Naber; Carlien Roelofzen; Alessio Fracasso; Douwe P Bergsma; Mies van Genderen; Giorgio L Porro; Serge O Dumoulin
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Clustered Volleys Stimulus Presentation for Multifocal Objective Perimetry.

Authors:  Corinne F Carle; Andrew C James; Faran Sabeti; Maria Kolic; Rohan W Essex; Chris Shean; Rhiannon Jeans; Aiasha Saikal; Alice Licinio; Ted Maddess
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.283

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.