Literature DB >> 11301000

Chimera analysis of the Clock mutation in mice shows that complex cellular integration determines circadian behavior.

S S Low-Zeddies1, J S Takahashi.   

Abstract

The Clock mutation lengthens periodicity and reduces amplitude of circadian rhythms in mice. The effects of Clock are cell intrinsic and can be observed at the level of single neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. To address how cells of contrasting genotype functionally interact in vivo to control circadian behavior, we have analyzed a series of Clock mutant mouse aggregation chimeras. Circadian behavior in Clock/Clock <--> wild-type chimeric individuals was determined by the proportion of mutant versus normal cells. Significantly, a number of intermediate phenotypes, including Clock/+ phenocopies and novel combinations of the parental behavioral characteristics, were seen in balanced chimeras. Multivariate statistical techniques were used to quantitatively analyze relationships among circadian period, amplitude, and suprachiasmatic nucleus composition. Together, our results demonstrate that complex integration of cellular phenotypes determines the generation and expression of coherent circadian rhythms at the organismal level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11301000      PMCID: PMC3798001          DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00294-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  62 in total

1.  Brain and ganglion development from two genotypic classes of cells in allophenic mice.

Authors:  M J Dewey; A G Gervais; B Mintz
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  Promoter traps in embryonic stem cells: a genetic screen to identify and mutate developmental genes in mice.

Authors:  G Friedrich; P Soriano
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 3.  Chimeras and mosaics in mouse mutant analysis.

Authors:  J Rossant; A Spence
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Circadian rhythms in mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus explants on multimicroelectrode plates.

Authors:  E D Herzog; M E Geusz; S B Khalsa; M Straume; G D Block
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1997-05-23       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Multiunit activity recordings in the suprachiasmatic nuclei: in vivo versus in vitro models.

Authors:  J H Meijer; J Schaap; K Watanabe; H Albus
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1997-04-11       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Disruption of overlapping transcripts in the ROSA beta geo 26 gene trap strain leads to widespread expression of beta-galactosidase in mouse embryos and hematopoietic cells.

Authors:  B P Zambrowicz; A Imamoto; S Fiering; L A Herzenberg; W G Kerr; P Soriano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Molecular cloning and characterization of the human CLOCK gene: expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei.

Authors:  T D Steeves; D P King; Y Zhao; A M Sangoram; F Du; A M Bowcock; R Y Moore; J S Takahashi
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 5.736

8.  Nonphotic phase-shifting in clock mutant mice.

Authors:  E Challet; J S Takahashi; F W Turek
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-03-24       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  A molecular mechanism regulating rhythmic output from the suprachiasmatic circadian clock.

Authors:  X Jin; L P Shearman; D R Weaver; M J Zylka; G J de Vries; S M Reppert
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-01-08       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Positional cloning of the mouse circadian clock gene.

Authors:  D P King; Y Zhao; A M Sangoram; L D Wilsbacher; M Tanaka; M P Antoch; T D Steeves; M H Vitaterna; J M Kornhauser; P L Lowrey; F W Turek; J S Takahashi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-05-16       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  57 in total

1.  The biological clock nucleus: a multiphasic oscillator network regulated by light.

Authors:  Jorge E Quintero; Sandra J Kuhlman; Douglas G McMahon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The circadian clock in the brain: a structural and functional comparison between mammals and insects.

Authors:  Charlotte Helfrich-Förster
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Synchronization and entrainment of coupled circadian oscillators.

Authors:  N Komin; A C Murza; E Hernández-García; R Toral
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Chronic stimulation of the hypothalamic vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor lengthens circadian period in mice and hamsters.

Authors:  Harry Pantazopoulos; Hamid Dolatshad; Fred C Davis
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Ghrelin-immunopositive hypothalamic neurons tie the circadian clock and visual system to the lateral hypothalamic arousal center.

Authors:  Tamas L Horvath; Alfonso Abizaid; Marcelo O Dietrich; Ying Li; Joseph S Takahashi; Joseph Bass
Journal:  Mol Metab       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 7.422

6.  The suprachiasmatic nucleus is a functionally heterogeneous timekeeping organ.

Authors:  Rae Silver; William J Schwartz
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Electrical hyperexcitation of lateral ventral pacemaker neurons desynchronizes downstream circadian oscillators in the fly circadian circuit and induces multiple behavioral periods.

Authors:  Michael N Nitabach; Ying Wu; Vasu Sheeba; William C Lemon; John Strumbos; Paul K Zelensky; Benjamin H White; Todd C Holmes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  miRNAs are required for generating a time delay critical for the circadian oscillator.

Authors:  Rongmin Chen; Matthew D'Alessandro; Choogon Lee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  A recessive mutant of Drosophila Clock reveals a role in circadian rhythm amplitude.

Authors:  Ravi Allada; Sebastian Kadener; Namrata Nandakumar; Michael Rosbash
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  A chimera analysis of prestin knock-out mice.

Authors:  Mary Ann Cheatham; Sharon Low-Zeddies; Khurram Naik; Roxanne Edge; Jing Zheng; Charles T Anderson; Peter Dallos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.