BACKGROUND: The class III beta-tubulin isotype (betaIII) is widely regarded as a neuronal marker in development and neoplasia. In previous work, we have shown that the expression of betaIII in neuronal/neuroblastic tumors is differentiation dependent. In contrast, the aberrant localization of this isotype in certain nonneuronal neoplasms, such as epithelial neuroendocrine lung tumors, is associated with anaplastic potential. OBJECTIVE: To test the generality of this observation, we investigated the immunoreactivity profile of betaIII in astrocytomas. DESIGN: Sixty archival, surgically excised astrocytomas (8 pilocytic astrocytomas, WHO grade 1; 18 diffuse fibrillary astrocytomas, WHO grade 2; 4 anaplastic astrocytomas, WHO grade 3; and 30 glioblastomas, WHO grade 4), were studied by immunohistochemistry using anti-betaIII monoclonal (TuJ1) and polyclonal antibodies. A monoclonal antibody to Ki-67 nuclear antigen (NC-MM1) was used as a marker for cell proliferation. Antibodies to glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and BM89 synaptic vesicle antigen/synaptophysin were used as glial and neuronal markers, respectively. RESULTS: The betaIII immunoreactivity was significantly greater in high-grade astrocytomas (anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas; median labeling index [MLI], 35%; interquartile range [IQR], 20%-47%) as compared with diffuse fibrillary astrocytomas (MLI, 4%; IQR, 0.2%-21%) (P <.0001) and was rarely detectable in pilocytic astrocytomas (MLI, 0%; IQR, 0%-0.5%) (P <.0001 vs high-grade astrocytomas; P <.01 vs diffuse fibrillary astrocytomas). A highly significant, grade-dependent relationship was observed between betaIII and Ki-67 labeling and malignancy, but this association was stronger for Ki-67 than for betaIII (betaIII, P <.006; Ki-67, P <.0001). There was co-localization of betaIII and GFAP in neoplastic astrocytes, but no BM89 synaptic vesicle antigen/synaptophysin staining was detected. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of astrocytic gliomas, betaIII immunoreactivity is associated with an ascending gradient of malignancy and thus may be a useful ancillary diagnostic marker. However, the significance of betaIII-positive phenotypes in diffuse fibrillary astrocytomas with respect to prognostic and predictive value requires further evaluation. Under certain neoplastic conditions, betaIII expression is not neuron specific, calling for a cautious interpretation of betaIII-positive phenotypes in brain tumors.
BACKGROUND: The class III beta-tubulin isotype (betaIII) is widely regarded as a neuronal marker in development and neoplasia. In previous work, we have shown that the expression of betaIII in neuronal/neuroblastic tumors is differentiation dependent. In contrast, the aberrant localization of this isotype in certain nonneuronal neoplasms, such as epithelial neuroendocrine lung tumors, is associated with anaplastic potential. OBJECTIVE: To test the generality of this observation, we investigated the immunoreactivity profile of betaIII in astrocytomas. DESIGN: Sixty archival, surgically excised astrocytomas (8 pilocytic astrocytomas, WHO grade 1; 18 diffuse fibrillary astrocytomas, WHO grade 2; 4 anaplastic astrocytomas, WHO grade 3; and 30 glioblastomas, WHO grade 4), were studied by immunohistochemistry using anti-betaIII monoclonal (TuJ1) and polyclonal antibodies. A monoclonal antibody to Ki-67 nuclear antigen (NC-MM1) was used as a marker for cell proliferation. Antibodies to glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and BM89 synaptic vesicle antigen/synaptophysin were used as glial and neuronal markers, respectively. RESULTS: The betaIII immunoreactivity was significantly greater in high-grade astrocytomas (anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas; median labeling index [MLI], 35%; interquartile range [IQR], 20%-47%) as compared with diffuse fibrillary astrocytomas (MLI, 4%; IQR, 0.2%-21%) (P <.0001) and was rarely detectable in pilocytic astrocytomas (MLI, 0%; IQR, 0%-0.5%) (P <.0001 vs high-grade astrocytomas; P <.01 vs diffuse fibrillary astrocytomas). A highly significant, grade-dependent relationship was observed between betaIII and Ki-67 labeling and malignancy, but this association was stronger for Ki-67 than for betaIII (betaIII, P <.006; Ki-67, P <.0001). There was co-localization of betaIII and GFAP in neoplastic astrocytes, but no BM89 synaptic vesicle antigen/synaptophysin staining was detected. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of astrocytic gliomas, betaIII immunoreactivity is associated with an ascending gradient of malignancy and thus may be a useful ancillary diagnostic marker. However, the significance of betaIII-positive phenotypes in diffuse fibrillary astrocytomas with respect to prognostic and predictive value requires further evaluation. Under certain neoplastic conditions, betaIII expression is not neuron specific, calling for a cautious interpretation of betaIII-positive phenotypes in brain tumors.
Authors: Anjali Shiras; Arti Bhosale; Varsha Shepal; Ravi Shukla; V S Baburao; K Prabhakara; Padma Shastry Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2003 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Marie E Beckner; Esther P Jane; Brian Jankowitz; Naomi R Agostino; Kevin A Walter; Ronald L Hamilton; Ian F Pollack Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2007-05-31 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Eduarda Dráberová; Stanislav Vinopal; Gerardo Morfini; Pei S Liu; Vladimíra Sládková; Tetyana Sulimenko; Matthew R Burns; Joanna Solowska; Kandan Kulandaivel; Jean-Pierre de Chadarévian; Agustin Legido; Sverre J Mörk; Jiří Janáček; Peter W Baas; Pavel Dráber; Christos D Katsetos Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: Yuan Zhu; Frantz Guignard; Dawen Zhao; Li Liu; Dennis K Burns; Ralph P Mason; Albee Messing; Luis F Parada Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Sarah Kirby; Stan Z Gertler; Warren Mason; Christopher Watling; Peter Forsyth; Jacinta Aniagolu; Robert Stagg; Matthew Wright; Jean Powers; Elizabeth A Eisenhauer Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Christos D Katsetos; Eduarda Dráberová; Barbora Smejkalová; Goutham Reddy; Louise Bertrand; Jean-Pierre de Chadarévian; Agustin Legido; Jonathan Nissanov; Peter W Baas; Pavel Dráber Journal: Neurochem Res Date: 2007-04-04 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Lee-Chuan C Yeh; Asok Banerjee; Veena Prasad; Jack A Tuszynski; Alexander L Weis; Tamas Bakos; I-Tien Yeh; Richard F Ludueña; John C Lee Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Chih-Yuan Tseng; Jonathan Y Mane; Philip Winter; Lorelei Johnson; Torin Huzil; Elzbieta Izbicka; Richard F Luduena; Jack A Tuszynski Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2010-05-30 Impact factor: 27.401