OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to test the hypothesis that a combination of markers for Type 1 diabetes (glutamate decarboxylase and IA-2 autoantibodies) and for Type 2 diabetes [oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and body mass index (BMI)], would predict clinical diabetes in a regional population. DESIGN: A population-based follow-up cohort study. SETTING: Participants visited the primary health care centre in Lycksele, Sweden in 1988-92. PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of 2278 subjects (M/F 1149/1129) who were studied at follow-up in 1998. At base line there were 2314 subjects (M/F 1167/1147) who participated in the Västerbotten Intervention Program on their birthday when turning either 30, 40, 50 or 60 years of age. Main outcome measurements. A clinically diagnosed diabetes at follow-up when the medical records were reviewed for diagnosis of diabetes. At base line, the participants were subjected to a standard OGTT and their BMI determined along with the autoantibodies. RESULTS: At follow-up, 42/2278 (1.8%, 95% CI 1.2-2.3) (M/F 23/19) had developed diabetes: 41 subjects were clinically classified with Type 2 and one with Type 1 diabetes. There was no significant relation between autoantibody levels at base line and diabetes at follow-up. Stepwise multiple logistic regression showed that the odds ratio for developing diabetes was 10.8 (95% CI 6.3-18.9) in subjects in the fourth quartile of BMI (BMI > 27) compared with 7.8 (95% CI 4.8-12.6) in the fourth quartile of 2-h plasma glucose (>7.5 mmol L(-1)) and 7.2 (95% CI 4.8-11.4) in the fourth quartile of the fasting plasma glucose (>5.6 mmol L(-1)). CONCLUSION: Islet cell autoantibodies did not predict diabetes at follow-up. BMI measured at base line was as effective as 2-h plasma glucose and fasting plasma glucose to predict diabetes in this adult population.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to test the hypothesis that a combination of markers for Type 1 diabetes (glutamate decarboxylase and IA-2 autoantibodies) and for Type 2 diabetes [oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and body mass index (BMI)], would predict clinical diabetes in a regional population. DESIGN: A population-based follow-up cohort study. SETTING:Participants visited the primary health care centre in Lycksele, Sweden in 1988-92. PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of 2278 subjects (M/F 1149/1129) who were studied at follow-up in 1998. At base line there were 2314 subjects (M/F 1167/1147) who participated in the Västerbotten Intervention Program on their birthday when turning either 30, 40, 50 or 60 years of age. Main outcome measurements. A clinically diagnosed diabetes at follow-up when the medical records were reviewed for diagnosis of diabetes. At base line, the participants were subjected to a standard OGTT and their BMI determined along with the autoantibodies. RESULTS: At follow-up, 42/2278 (1.8%, 95% CI 1.2-2.3) (M/F 23/19) had developed diabetes: 41 subjects were clinically classified with Type 2 and one with Type 1 diabetes. There was no significant relation between autoantibody levels at base line and diabetes at follow-up. Stepwise multiple logistic regression showed that the odds ratio for developing diabetes was 10.8 (95% CI 6.3-18.9) in subjects in the fourth quartile of BMI (BMI > 27) compared with 7.8 (95% CI 4.8-12.6) in the fourth quartile of 2-h plasma glucose (>7.5 mmol L(-1)) and 7.2 (95% CI 4.8-11.4) in the fourth quartile of the fasting plasma glucose (>5.6 mmol L(-1)). CONCLUSION: Islet cell autoantibodies did not predict diabetes at follow-up. BMI measured at base line was as effective as 2-h plasma glucose and fasting plasma glucose to predict diabetes in this adult population.
Authors: Akram Alyass; Peter Almgren; Mikael Akerlund; Jonathan Dushoff; Bo Isomaa; Peter Nilsson; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Valeriya Lyssenko; Leif Groop; David Meyre Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: C S Hampe; J R Radtke; A Wester; A Carlsson; E Cedervall; B Jönsson; S A Ivarsson; H Elding Larsson; K Larsson; B Lindberg; J Neiderud; O Rolandsson; Å Lernmark Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2018-12-28 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: D Luo; L K Gilliam; C Greenbaum; L Bekris; C S Hampe; T Daniels; W Richter; S M Marcovina; O Rolandsson; M Landin-Olsson; I Kockum; A Lernmark Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2004-09-08 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Virve M Lundgren; Bo Isomaa; Valeriya Lyssenko; Esa Laurila; Pasi Korhonen; Leif C Groop; Tiinamaija Tuomi Journal: Diabetes Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Elin Pettersen Sørgjerd; Per M Thorsby; Peter A Torjesen; Frank Skorpen; Kirsti Kvaløy; Valdemar Grill Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2015-06-25
Authors: Brigitte I Frohnert; Bobbie-Jo Webb-Robertson; Lisa M Bramer; Sara M Reehl; Kathy Waugh; Andrea K Steck; Jill M Norris; Marian Rewers Journal: Diabetes Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 9.461