Literature DB >> 11298839

Comparison between computerized slow-stage and static liquid nitrogen vapour freezing methods with respect to the deleterious effect on chromatin and morphology of spermatozoa from fertile and subfertile men.

M E Hammadeh1, C Dehn, M Hippach, T Zeginiadou, M Stieber, T Georg, P Rosenbaum, W Schmidt.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the negative effects (cryodamage) on human spermatozoa after freeze-thawing and to determine whether freeze-thawing of spermatozoa with a programmed slow freezer is better than freezing with liquid nitrogen vapour (rapid freezing) with regard to alterations in sperm chromatin and morphology in semen from fertile (donor) and subfertile, IVF/ICSI, patients. Ninety-five semen samples were obtained either from patients attending our IVF unit for treatment (n=34) or from donors (n=25) with proven fertility and normal sperm quality according to WHO guidelines. Each semen sample was divided into two parts after liquefaction and addition of the cryoprotectant. The first part was frozen using a programmed biological freezer and the second part was frozen by means of liquid nitrogen vapour. Smears were made before the freezing and after the thawing procedure to assess morphology (strict criteria) and chromatin condensation (Acridine Orange test). The mean percentage of chromatin condensed spermatozoa in the samples from donors (control group) was 92.4 +/- 8.4% before freezing and this decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) to 88.7 +/- 11.2% after freeze-thawing with the computerized slow-stage freezer and to 87.2 +/- 12.3% after using static liquid nitrogen vapour (p < 0.001). The corresponding values for semen obtained from patients was 78.9 +/- 10.3% before freezing which decreased to 70.7 +/- 10.8 and 68.5 +/- 14.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). On the other hand, the mean percentage of normal sperm morphology in the control group decreased from 26.3 +/- 7.5% before freezing to 22.1 +/- 6.4% (p < 0.0001) after thawing with the computerized slow-stage freezer and to 22.2 +/- 6.6% (p < 0.0001) after the use of static liquid nitrogen vapour. In the patient group, the mean percentage of normal morphology decreased from 11.7 +/- 6.1% after freezing with the biological freezer to 9.3 +/- 5.6% and to 8.0 +/- 4.9% after freezing with static liquid nitrogen vapour. This study demonstrates that chromatin packaging and morphology of human spermatozoa decrease significantly after the freeze-thawing procedure, not only after the use of static liquid nitrogen vapour but also after the use of a computerized slow-stage freezer. However, the chromatin of semen samples with normal semen parameters (donor sperm) withstand the freeze-thaw injury better than those with low quality semen samples. Therefore, the computerized slow stage freezer could be recommended for freezing of human spermatozoa, especially for subnormal semen samples, for example, ICSI and ICSI/TESE candidates and from patients with testicular tumours or Hodgkin's disease, in order to avoid further damage to the sperm chromatin structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11298839     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2605.2001.00270.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Androl        ISSN: 0105-6263


  7 in total

1.  Effects of cryopreservation on sperm parameters and ultrastructural morphology of human spermatozoa.

Authors:  Sinan Ozkavukcu; Esra Erdemli; Ayca Isik; Derya Oztuna; Sercin Karahuseyinoglu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Sperm parameters that play a major role in the assessment of semen quality after cryopreservation.

Authors:  A Palomar Rios; I Molina Botella
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Sperm preparation after freezing improves motile sperm count, motility, and viability in frozen-thawed sperm compared with sperm preparation before freezing-thawing process.

Authors:  A Palomar Rios; A Gascón; J V Martínez; S Balasch; I Molina Botella
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Human Sperm Cryopreservation: Update on Techniques, Effect on DNA Integrity, and Implications for ART.

Authors:  Marlea Di Santo; Nicoletta Tarozzi; Marco Nadalini; Andrea Borini
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-12-13

Review 5.  Laboratory and clinical management of leukocytospermia and hematospermia: a review.

Authors:  Kajal Khodamoradi; Manish Kuchakulla; Manish Narasimman; Zahra Khosravizadeh; Aleena Ali; Nancy Brackett; Emad Ibrahim; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Ther Adv Reprod Health       Date:  2020-06-11

6.  Is pre-freeze sperm preparation more advantageous than post-freeze?

Authors:  Dimitra Apostolia Androni; Sophie Dodds; Mathew Tomlinson; Walid E Maalouf
Journal:  Reprod Fertil       Date:  2021-03-01

7.  Cryopreservation of ferret (Mustela putorius furo) sperm collected by rectal massage and electroejaculation: Comparison of a decelerating and an accelerating freezing rate protocol.

Authors:  Adolfo Toledano-Díaz; Cristina Castaño; Rosario Velázquez; Paula Bóveda; Antonio López-Sebastián; Eva Martínez-Nevado; Silvia Villaverde-Morcillo; Milagros C Esteso; Julián Santiago-Moreno
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.