R Wolk1, S Stec, P Kulakowski. 1. Postgraduate Medical School, Warsaw, Poland. r_wolk@hotmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Experimental studies suggest that the electrocardiographic Tpeak-Tend (TpTe) interval reflects transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR). The genesis and role of the TpTe interval in a clinical setting have not been established. This study aimed to assess the clinical usefulness of the TpTe interval as an index of TDR and a pro-arrhythmic marker. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endocardial monophasic action potential (MAP) duration and electrocardiographic QTp, QTe and TpTe intervals were assessed in 13 patients undergoing an electrophysiological study. Surface electrocardiograms were recorded during right ventricular pacing (Basic Cycle Length = 600 ms) before and after single extrastimuli. RESULTS: Ventricular arrhythmia was induced in six patients. During ventricular pacing, MAP duration and QTp intervals shortened in response to extrastimuli applied at progressively shorter coupling intervals. In contrast, QTe intervals increased in response to premature stimulation and QTe dispersion increased at short coupling intervals. During sinus rhythm, the TpTe interval was greater in the inducible group in leads V3-V4. Premature stimulation increased the duration of TpTe intervals, suggesting an increase in TDR. The maximum TpTe interval was greater in the inducible than in the noninducible group, both during baseline ventricular drive pacing (163 +/- 22 vs. 130 +/- 27 ms, respectively, P < 0.03) and after application of shortly coupled extrastimuli (263 +/- 66 vs. 200 +/- 47 ms, respectively, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The TpTe interval of surface ECG is likely to represent TDR. TDR is increased by premature ventricular stimulation and the magnitude of the maximum TpTe interval (i.e. maximum TDR) during ventricular pacing is greater in patients with inducible arrhythmias.
BACKGROUND: Experimental studies suggest that the electrocardiographic Tpeak-Tend (TpTe) interval reflects transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR). The genesis and role of the TpTe interval in a clinical setting have not been established. This study aimed to assess the clinical usefulness of the TpTe interval as an index of TDR and a pro-arrhythmic marker. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endocardial monophasic action potential (MAP) duration and electrocardiographic QTp, QTe and TpTe intervals were assessed in 13 patients undergoing an electrophysiological study. Surface electrocardiograms were recorded during right ventricular pacing (Basic Cycle Length = 600 ms) before and after single extrastimuli. RESULTS:Ventricular arrhythmia was induced in six patients. During ventricular pacing, MAP duration and QTp intervals shortened in response to extrastimuli applied at progressively shorter coupling intervals. In contrast, QTe intervals increased in response to premature stimulation and QTe dispersion increased at short coupling intervals. During sinus rhythm, the TpTe interval was greater in the inducible group in leads V3-V4. Premature stimulation increased the duration of TpTe intervals, suggesting an increase in TDR. The maximum TpTe interval was greater in the inducible than in the noninducible group, both during baseline ventricular drive pacing (163 +/- 22 vs. 130 +/- 27 ms, respectively, P < 0.03) and after application of shortly coupled extrastimuli (263 +/- 66 vs. 200 +/- 47 ms, respectively, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The TpTe interval of surface ECG is likely to represent TDR. TDR is increased by premature ventricular stimulation and the magnitude of the maximum TpTe interval (i.e. maximum TDR) during ventricular pacing is greater in patients with inducible arrhythmias.
Authors: Charles Antzelevitch; Serge Sicouri; José M Di Diego; Alexander Burashnikov; Sami Viskin; Wataru Shimizu; Gan-Xin Yan; Peter Kowey; Li Zhang Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2007-06-08 Impact factor: 6.343