BACKGROUND: Recent observations indicate an association between antibodies against mycobacterial heat shock protein (hsp65) and coronary heart disease (CHD). Previously, we reported on marked differences in antigen specificity and complement activating ability of anti-hsp65 antibodies and auto-antibodies against human heat shock protein, hsp60. Here, we investigated whether there are differences between antih-sp65 and anti-hsp60 antibodies in their association with CHD. DESIGN: We measured by ELISA the levels of antibodies to hsp65, hsp60 and E. coli-derived GroEL in three groups: Group I, 357 patients with severe CHD who underwent by-pass surgery; Group II, 67 patients with negative coronary angiography; Group III, 321 healthy blood donors. Antibodies against Helicobacter pylori were also measured by commercial ELISA. RESULTS: As calculated by multiple regression analysis, the levels of anti-hsp60 auto-antibodies were significantly higher in Group I compared to Group II (P = 0.007) or Group III (P < 0.0001). By contrast, although concentrations of anti-hsp65 and anti-GroEL antibodies in Group I were higher than in Group III, no significant differences between Group I and Group II were found. Antibodies to the two bacterial hsp strongly correlated to each other, but either did not correlate or weakly correlated to hsp60. In Group I, serum concentrations of anti-H.pylori antibodies significantly correlated with those of anti-hsp65 and anti-GroEL antibodies but they did not correlate with the anti-hsp60 antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: As to their clinical relevance, a remarkable difference become evident between antibodies to human hsp60 and antibodies against bacterial hsp in the extent of association with CHD. On the basis of these findings and some pertinent literature data, an alternative explanation for the association between high level of anti-hsp antibodies and atherosclerotic vascular diseases is raised.
BACKGROUND: Recent observations indicate an association between antibodies against mycobacterial heat shock protein (hsp65) and coronary heart disease (CHD). Previously, we reported on marked differences in antigen specificity and complement activating ability of anti-hsp65 antibodies and auto-antibodies against human heat shock protein, hsp60. Here, we investigated whether there are differences between antih-sp65 and anti-hsp60 antibodies in their association with CHD. DESIGN: We measured by ELISA the levels of antibodies to hsp65, hsp60 and E. coli-derived GroEL in three groups: Group I, 357 patients with severe CHD who underwent by-pass surgery; Group II, 67 patients with negative coronary angiography; Group III, 321 healthy blood donors. Antibodies against Helicobacter pylori were also measured by commercial ELISA. RESULTS: As calculated by multiple regression analysis, the levels of anti-hsp60 auto-antibodies were significantly higher in Group I compared to Group II (P = 0.007) or Group III (P < 0.0001). By contrast, although concentrations of anti-hsp65 and anti-GroEL antibodies in Group I were higher than in Group III, no significant differences between Group I and Group II were found. Antibodies to the two bacterial hsp strongly correlated to each other, but either did not correlate or weakly correlated to hsp60. In Group I, serum concentrations of anti-H.pylori antibodies significantly correlated with those of anti-hsp65 and anti-GroEL antibodies but they did not correlate with the anti-hsp60 antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: As to their clinical relevance, a remarkable difference become evident between antibodies to humanhsp60 and antibodies against bacterial hsp in the extent of association with CHD. On the basis of these findings and some pertinent literature data, an alternative explanation for the association between high level of anti-hsp antibodies and atherosclerotic vascular diseases is raised.
Authors: George Füst; Katalin Uray; László Bene; Ferenc Hudecz; István Karádi; Zoltán Prohászka Journal: Cell Stress Chaperones Date: 2011-10-29 Impact factor: 3.667
Authors: Eliana A P Nahas; Jorge Nahas-Neto; Claudio L Orsatti; Ana Paula Tardivo; Gilberto Uemura; Maria Terezinha S Peraçoli; Steven S Witkin Journal: Cell Stress Chaperones Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 3.667
Authors: Attila Molvarec; Zoltán Derzsy; Judit Kocsis; Tamás Boze; Bálint Nagy; Krisztián Balogh; Veronika Makó; László Cervenak; Miklós Mézes; István Karádi; Zoltán Prohászka; János Rigó Journal: Cell Stress Chaperones Date: 2009-02-11 Impact factor: 3.667