C J de Souza1, K Gagen, W Chen, N Dragonas. 1. Metabolic and Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research, Summit, NJ 07901, USA. christopher.desouza@pharma.novartis.com
Abstract
AIM: Islet dysfunction, characterized by the loss of an acute insulin secretory response (AIR) to glucose is a well-established pathology of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Using oral insulin secreting agents with very different pharmacodynamic profiles, the present study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that, within the setting of an underlying insulin resistance, changes in the insulin response profile can differentially affect glycaemic control. METHOD: The mildly insulin resistant high-fat fed Sprague Dawley (HF) rat and the very insulin resistant Zucker fatty (fa/fa) rat, chronically fitted with indwelling jugular cannula were subjected to an oral glucose load. Compounds were administered 5 min before the oral glucose load. Nateglinide (Nateg) was administered to elicit only an early insulin secretory response and glipizide (Glip) to elicit a later but greater insulin secretory response. Acetaminophen was used as a marker to assess for potential effects of these compounds on gastric emptying rates. RESULTS: Nateg rapidly increased early insulin release (from -5 to 0) while the effects on total insulin release were similar to those in the controls and glucose excursions were eliminated in both diabetic models with no evidence of sustained hypoglycaemia. Conversely, Glip did not affect early insulin release but increased total insulin release (- 15 to 120 min), but only after the oral glucose load. Glip partially curbed glucose excursions in the mildly insulin resistant HF rodent and was totally ineffective in the very insulin resistant Zucker rat. The differential effects could not be attributed to effects on gastric emptying rates. CONCLUSION: These data support the importance of early insulin release in type 2 diabetes mellitus and indicate that, independent of the level of insulin resistance, stimulating insulin release early and briefly provides for more effective and tighter glycaemic control than increasing insulin exposure to a greater magnitude later.
AIM: Islet dysfunction, characterized by the loss of an acute insulin secretory response (AIR) to glucose is a well-established pathology of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Using oral insulin secreting agents with very different pharmacodynamic profiles, the present study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that, within the setting of an underlying insulin resistance, changes in the insulin response profile can differentially affect glycaemic control. METHOD: The mildly insulin resistant high-fat fed Sprague Dawley (HF) rat and the very insulin resistant Zucker fatty (fa/fa) rat, chronically fitted with indwelling jugular cannula were subjected to an oral glucose load. Compounds were administered 5 min before the oral glucose load. Nateglinide (Nateg) was administered to elicit only an early insulin secretory response and glipizide (Glip) to elicit a later but greater insulin secretory response. Acetaminophen was used as a marker to assess for potential effects of these compounds on gastric emptying rates. RESULTS:Nateg rapidly increased early insulin release (from -5 to 0) while the effects on total insulin release were similar to those in the controls and glucose excursions were eliminated in both diabetic models with no evidence of sustained hypoglycaemia. Conversely, Glip did not affect early insulin release but increased total insulin release (- 15 to 120 min), but only after the oral glucose load. Glip partially curbed glucose excursions in the mildly insulin resistant HF rodent and was totally ineffective in the very insulin resistant Zucker rat. The differential effects could not be attributed to effects on gastric emptying rates. CONCLUSION: These data support the importance of early insulin release in type 2 diabetes mellitus and indicate that, independent of the level of insulin resistance, stimulating insulin release early and briefly provides for more effective and tighter glycaemic control than increasing insulin exposure to a greater magnitude later.
Authors: Torsten P Vahl; Benedikt A Aulinger; Eric P Smith; Deborah L Drazen; Yve Ulrich-Lai; Randy J Seeley; Stephen C Woods; David A D'Alessio Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-08-26 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Young Min Cho; Bo Kyung Koo; Ho Young Son; Kwang Woo Lee; Hyun Shik Son; Dong Seop Choi; Bo Wan Kim; Yong Ki Kim; Moon Kyu Lee; Hyun Chul Lee; Kyung Wan Min; Min Young Chung; Hong Sun Baek; Youngkun Kim; Hyung Joon Yoo; Kyong Soo Park; Hong Kyu Lee Journal: J Diabetes Investig Date: 2010-08-02 Impact factor: 4.232