Literature DB >> 11298538

SDZ ASM 981: an emerging safe and effective treatment for atopic dermatitis.

T Luger1, E J Van Leent, M Graeber, S Hedgecock, M Thurston, A Kandra, J Berth-Jones, J Bjerke, E Christophers, J Knop, A C Knulst, M Morren, A Morris, S Reitamo, J Roed-Petersen, E Schoepf, K Thestrup-Pedersen, P G Van Der Valk, J D Bos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: SDZ ASM 981 is a selective inhibitor of the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines from T cells and mast cells in vitro. It is the first ascomycin macrolactam derivative under development for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases.
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of SDZ ASM 981 cream at concentrations of 0.05%, 0.2%, 0.6% and 1.0% in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis and to select the concentration to be used in phase III studies.
METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicentre dose-finding study. A total of 260 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with SDZ ASM 981 cream at concentrations of 0.05%, 0.2%, 0.6%, or 1.0%, matching vehicle cream, or the internal control 0.1% betamethasone-17-valerate cream (BMV). Treatment was given twice daily for up to 3 weeks.
RESULTS: A clear dose-response relationship for SDZ ASM 981 was evident, with 0.2%, 0.6% and 1.0% SDZ ASM 981 creams all being significantly more effective than vehicle (P = 0.041, 0.001 and 0.008, respectively) in terms of baseline to end-point changes in the Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI) and pruritus score. The 1.0% cream was the most effective SDZ ASM 981 concentration. BMV was more effective than the SDZ ASM 981 creams tested in this study. It appears that the efficacy plateau was not reached with the SDZ ASM 981 creams within 3 weeks treatment. SDZ ASM 981 was well tolerated. Burning or a feeling of warmth were the only adverse events reported more frequently in the 0.6% and 1.0% SDZ ASM 981 treatment groups than in the vehicle treatment group (42.9%, 48.9% and 34.9%, respectively). Few systemic adverse events were reported during the study (headache was the most frequent systemic event reported by 15 of 252 patients) and none was considered to be related to treatment. The local tolerability profile of the 1.0% cream was similar to that of the lower concentrations.
CONCLUSIONS: 1.0% SDZ ASM 981 cream, which was shown to be safe, well tolerated and the most effective concentration in this study, was selected as the concentration to be further developed in phase III studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11298538     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04134.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  26 in total

Review 1.  [Topical corticosteroids versus topical inhibitors of calcineurin].

Authors:  R Niedner
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 2.  [Practice experience with topical calcineurin inhibitors].

Authors:  J Lübbe
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  New treatments for atopic dermatitis.

Authors:  Hywel Williams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-29

Review 4.  Safety of topical calcineurin inhibitors in atopic dermatitis: evaluation of the evidence.

Authors:  Jonathan M Spergel; Donald Y M Leung
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 5.  The economics of topical immunomodulators for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.

Authors:  William Abramovits; Mark Boguniewicz; Amy S Paller; Diane L Whitaker-Worth; Mary M Prendergast; Michael Tokar; Kuo B Tong
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Mediators of Chronic Pruritus in Atopic Dermatitis: Getting the Itch Out?

Authors:  Nicholas K Mollanazar; Peter K Smith; Gil Yosipovitch
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 8.667

7.  Penetration of ASM 981 in canine skin: a comparative study.

Authors:  Meret E Ricklin Gutzwiller; Martin Reist; Elke Persohn; John E Peel; Petra J Roosje
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 8.  The diagnosis and graded therapy of atopic dermatitis.

Authors:  Thomas Werfel; Nicolaus Schwerk; Gesine Hansen; Alexander Kapp
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 9.  Efficacy and tolerability of topical pimecrolimus and tacrolimus in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Darren M Ashcroft; Paul Dimmock; Ruth Garside; Ken Stein; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-02-24

10.  Pimecrolimus does not affect the differentiation, maturation and function of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells, in contrast to corticosteroids.

Authors:  F S Kalthoff; J Chung; P Musser; A Stuetz
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.