Literature DB >> 11298314

Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions.

G R Janson1, A Metaxas, D G Woodside, M R de Freitas, A Pinzan.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine if any significant differences existed with regard to dental and skeletal asymmetries between subjects with Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions and subjects with normal occlusions. The sample consisted of 30 subjects in each of the 2 groups. Each possessed a full complement of permanent teeth, including first molars. The average age of subjects was 15.76 years in the Class II subdivision group and 22.42 years in the normal occlusion group. Measurements were obtained with the use of submentovertex, posteroanterior, and corrected oblique cephalometric radiographs. In the submentovertex radiographs, symmetry was assessed by measuring the relative differences in the spatial positions of dental and skeletal landmarks between the right and the left sides in both anteroposterior and transverse dimensions. Coordinate systems were used to represent the mandible, cranial floor, and the maxilla. In the posteroanterior radiographs, symmetry was assessed similarly by measuring the relative differences in the spatial positions of dental and skeletal landmarks between the right and the left sides. In the corrected oblique radiographs, symmetry was assessed by measuring the differences in size of dental and skeletal structures between the right and the left sides. Variables were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression analysis. The results demonstrated that the primary contributor to the differences between the 2 groups was the distal positioning of the mandibular first molars on the Class II side in patients whose mandibles showed no unusual skeletal or positional asymmetries. A secondary contributor was the mesial positioning of the maxillary first molars on the Class II side. Furthermore, the posteroanterior radiographic analysis showed that the more frequent distal positioning of the mandibular molars on the Class II side, compared with the mesial positioning of the maxillary molars on that side resulted in mandibular dental midline deviation to the Class II side more frequently than the maxillary dental midline to the opposite side.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11298314     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.113267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  16 in total

1.  Asymmetric dental arch treatment with Forsus fatigue appliances: Long-term results.

Authors:  Mehmet Akın; Emire Aybuke Erdur; Onur Öztürk
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Analysis of facial skeletal asymmetry during foetal development using μCT imaging.

Authors:  Motoki Katsube; Sara M Rolfe; Stephanie R Bortolussi; Yutaka Yamaguchi; Joy M Richman; Shigehito Yamada; Siddharth R Vora
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Computer-guided technique evaluation of the bony palate for planning individual implant placement.

Authors:  Pinar Cagimni; Figen Govsa; Mehmet Asim Ozer; Zuhal Kazak
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Differences in third molar development and angulation in class II subdivision malocclusions.

Authors:  Ezgi Sunal Akturk; Elif Dilara Seker; Sena Akman; Gokmen Kurt
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Class II subdivision treatment with the Herbst appliance.

Authors:  Niko C Bock; Benjamin Reiser; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Localization of basicranium midline by submentovertex projection for the evaluation of condylar asymmetry.

Authors:  Michele Maglione; Fulvia Costantinides
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-01-18

7.  The use of three-dimensional cephalometric references in dentoskeletal symmetry diagnosis.

Authors:  Olavo Cesar Lyra Porto; Jairo Curado de Freitas; Ana Helena Gonçalves de Alencar; Carlos Estrela
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014-12-01

8.  Orthodontic treatment alternative to a class III subdivision malocclusion.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; José Eduardo Prado De Souza; Sérgio Estelita Cavalcante Barros; Pedro Andrade Junior; Alexandre Yudi Nakamura
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Dental arch asymmetry.

Authors:  Nabil Muhsen Al-Zubair
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-04

10.  An orthodontic-surgical approach to Class II subdivision malocclusion treatment.

Authors:  Marcos Janson; Guilherme Janson; Eduardo Sant'Ana; Tassiana Mesquita Simão; Marcos Roberto de Freitas
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.