Literature DB >> 11298310

Mandibular advancement surgery in high-angle and low-angle class II patients: different long-term skeletal responses.

K A Mobarak1, L Espeland, O Krogstad, T Lyberg.   

Abstract

The objective of this cephalometric study was to compare skeletal stability and the time course of postoperative changes in high-angle and low-angle Class II patients after mandibular advancement surgery. The subjects were 61 consecutive mandibular retrognathism patients whose treatment included bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and rigid fixation. The patients were divided according to the preoperative mandibular plane angle; the 20 patients with the lowest mandibular plane angle (20.8 degrees +/- 4.9 degrees ) constituted the low-angle group, while the 20 cases with the highest mandibular plane angle (43.0 degrees +/- 4.0 degrees ) represented the high-angle group. Lateral cephalograms were taken on 6 occasions: immediately before surgery, immediately after surgery, 2 and 6 months after surgery, and 1 and 3 years after surgery. Results demonstrated that the high-angle and low-angle groups had different patterns of surgical and postoperative changes. High-angle patients were associated with both a higher frequency and a greater magnitude of horizontal relapse. While 95% of the total relapse took place during the first 2 months after surgery in the low-angle group, high-angle patients demonstrated a more continuous relapse pattern, with a significant proportion (38%) occurring late in the follow-up period. Possible reasons for the different postsurgical response are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11298310     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.110983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  23 in total

1.  Three-dimensional surgical guide approach to correcting skeletal Class II malocclusion with idiopathic condylar resorption.

Authors:  Hongzhe Wang; Chaoran Xue; En Luo; Wenyu Dai; Rui Shu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Long-term stability and condylar remodeling after mandibular advancement: A 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Lauren Ehardt; Antonio Ruellas; Sean Edwards; Erika Benavides; Matthew Ames; Lucia Cevidanes
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Long-term stability of adolescent versus adult surgery for treatment of mandibular deficiency.

Authors:  W R Proffit; C Phillips; T A Turvey
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Skeletal relapse following sagittal split ramus osteotomy advancement.

Authors:  Nanda Kishore Sahoo; Balakrishnan Jayan; Ankur Thakral; Vishvaroop Nagpal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-09-13

Review 5.  Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Orthognathic Surgery: Demystifying Differences in Concepts, Techniques and Outcomes.

Authors:  Manikandhan Ramanathan; Godwin Alex Kiruba; Amelia Christabel; Anantanarayanan Parameswaran; Sanjanaa Kapoor; Hermann F Sailer
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-07-21

6.  Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of surgical stability and condylar displacement changes after counterclockwise maxillomandibular advancement surgery: Effect of simultaneous articular disc repositioning.

Authors:  Liliane Rosas Gomes; Lúcia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Marcelo Regis Gomes; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Daniel Patrick Obelenis Ryan; Beatriz Paniagua; Larry Miller Wolford; João Roberto Gonçalves
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Influence of the design in sagittal split ramus osteotomy on the mechanical behavior.

Authors:  Leandro Pozzer; Sergio Olate; Lucas Cavalieri-Pereira; Márcio de Moraes; José Ricardo Albergaría-Barbosa
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-05-15

8.  Soft-tissue changes in association with anterior maxillary osteotomy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mariko Okudaira; Tatsuo Kawamoto; Takashi Ono; Keiji Moriyama
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-07-16

9.  Occlusal stability after Herbst treatment of patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types : A pilot study.

Authors:  Niko C Bock; Erhard Gnandt; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Closure of anterior open bites with mandibular surgery: advantages and disadvantages of this approach.

Authors:  Joseph E Van Sickels; Aaron Wallender
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.