AIMS: Four well-described strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens were assessed for their effect on pea growth and their antagonistic activity against large Pythium ultimum inocula. METHODS AND RESULTS: The effect of Pseudomonas strains on the indigenous soil microflora, soil enzyme activities and plant growth in the presence and absence of Pythium was assessed. Pythium inoculation reduced the shoot and root weights, root length, and the number of lateral roots. The effect of Pythium was reduced by the Pseudomonas strains. Strains F113, SBW25 and CHAO increased shoot weights (by 20%, 22% and 35%, respectively); strains Q2-87, SBW25 and CHAO increased root weights (14%, 14% and 52%). Strains SBW25 and CHAO increased root lengths (19% and 69%) and increased the number of lateral roots (14% and 29%). All the Pseudomonas strains reduced the number of lesions and the root and soil Pythium populations, while SBW25 and CHAO increased the number of lateral roots. Pythium inoculation increased root and soil microbial populations but the magnitude of this effect was Pseudomonas strain-specific. Pythium increased the activity of C, N and P cycle enzymes, while the Pseudomonas strains reduced this effect, indicating reduced plant damage. CONCLUSION: Strains SBW25 and CHAO had the greatest beneficial characteristics, as these strains produced the greatest reductions in the side effects of Pythium infection (microbial populations and enzyme activities) and resulted in significantly improved plant growth. Strain SBW25 does not produce antifungal metabolites, and its biocontrol activity was related to a greater colonization ability in the rhizosphere. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This is the first critical comparison of such important strains of Ps. fluorescens showing disease biocontrol potential.
AIMS: Four well-described strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens were assessed for their effect on pea growth and their antagonistic activity against large Pythium ultimum inocula. METHODS AND RESULTS: The effect of Pseudomonas strains on the indigenous soil microflora, soil enzyme activities and plant growth in the presence and absence of Pythium was assessed. Pythium inoculation reduced the shoot and root weights, root length, and the number of lateral roots. The effect of Pythium was reduced by the Pseudomonas strains. Strains F113, SBW25 and CHAO increased shoot weights (by 20%, 22% and 35%, respectively); strains Q2-87, SBW25 and CHAO increased root weights (14%, 14% and 52%). Strains SBW25 and CHAO increased root lengths (19% and 69%) and increased the number of lateral roots (14% and 29%). All the Pseudomonas strains reduced the number of lesions and the root and soil Pythium populations, while SBW25 and CHAO increased the number of lateral roots. Pythium inoculation increased root and soil microbial populations but the magnitude of this effect was Pseudomonas strain-specific. Pythium increased the activity of C, N and P cycle enzymes, while the Pseudomonas strains reduced this effect, indicating reduced plant damage. CONCLUSION: Strains SBW25 and CHAO had the greatest beneficial characteristics, as these strains produced the greatest reductions in the side effects of Pythium infection (microbial populations and enzyme activities) and resulted in significantly improved plant growth. Strain SBW25 does not produce antifungal metabolites, and its biocontrol activity was related to a greater colonization ability in the rhizosphere. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This is the first critical comparison of such important strains of Ps. fluorescens showing disease biocontrol potential.
Authors: Emma Barahona; Ana Navazo; Francisco Martínez-Granero; Teresa Zea-Bonilla; Rosa María Pérez-Jiménez; Marta Martín; Rafael Rivilla Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2011-06-17 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Célia Maria M de Souza Silva; Vera Lúcia S S de Castro; Pablo Roberto de Oliveira; Aline de Holanda Nunes Maia Journal: Ecotoxicology Date: 2009-07-14 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Mark W Silby; Ana M Cerdeño-Tárraga; Georgios S Vernikos; Stephen R Giddens; Robert W Jackson; Gail M Preston; Xue-Xian Zhang; Christina D Moon; Stefanie M Gehrig; Scott A C Godfrey; Christopher G Knight; Jacob G Malone; Zena Robinson; Andrew J Spiers; Simon Harris; Gregory L Challis; Alice M Yaxley; David Harris; Kathy Seeger; Lee Murphy; Simon Rutter; Rob Squares; Michael A Quail; Elizabeth Saunders; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Thomas S Brettin; Stephen D Bentley; Joanne Hothersall; Elton Stephens; Christopher M Thomas; Julian Parkhill; Stuart B Levy; Paul B Rainey; Nicholas R Thomson Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2009-05-11 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Eleftheria Trampari; Clare E M Stevenson; Richard H Little; Thomas Wilhelm; David M Lawson; Jacob G Malone Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 5.157