Literature DB >> 11298072

Outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of a clinical pharmacy intervention in 52 nursing homes.

M S Roberts1, J A Stokes, M A King, T A Lynne, D M Purdie, P P Glasziou, D A Wilson, S T McCarthy, G E Brooks, F J de Looze, C B Del Mar.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate whether a year long clinical pharmacy program involving development of professional relationships, nurse education on medication issues, and individualized medication reviews could change drug use, mortality and morbidity in nursing home residents.
METHODS: A cluster randomised controlled trial, where an intervention home was matched to three control homes, was used to examine the effect of the clinical pharmacy intervention on resident outcomes. The study involved 905 residents in 13 intervention nursing homes and 2325 residents in 39 control nursing homes in south-east Queensland and north-east New South Wales, Australia. The outcome measures were: continuous drug use data from government prescription subsidy claims, cross-sectional drug use data on prescribed and administered medications, deaths and morbidity indices (hospitalization rates, adverse events and disability indices).
RESULTS: This intervention resulted in a reduction in drug use with no change in morbidity indices or survival. Differences in nursing home characteristics, as defined by cluster analysis with SUDAAN, negated intervention-related apparent significant improvements in survival. The use of benzodiazepines, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, laxatives, histamine H2-receptor antagonists and antacids was significantly reduced in the intervention group, whereas the use of digoxin and diuretics remained similar to controls. Overall, drug use in the intervention group was reduced by 14.8% relative to the controls, equivalent to an annual prescription saving of A64 dollars per resident (approximately 25 pound sterling).
CONCLUSIONS: This intervention improved nursing home resident outcomes related to changes in drug use and drug-related expenditure. The continuing divergence in both drug use and survival at the end of the study suggests that the difference would have been more significant in a larger and longer study, and even more so using additional instruments specific for measuring outcomes related to changes in drug use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11298072      PMCID: PMC2015028          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2001.00347.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  16 in total

1.  Multidisciplinary case conference reviews: improving outcomes for nursing home residents, carers and health professionals.

Authors:  M A King; M S Roberts
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2001-04

Review 2.  Improving medication prescribing and utilization in the nursing home.

Authors:  J H Gurwitz; S B Soumerai; J Avorn
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Analysis of falls in the acute surgical and cardiovascular surgical patient.

Authors:  J Llewellyn; B Martin; M Shekleton; S Firlit
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.257

Review 4.  Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume II--The design and analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  N E Breslow; N E Day
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1987

5.  Reducing antipsychotic drug use in nursing homes. A controlled trial of provider education.

Authors:  W A Ray; J A Taylor; K G Meador; M J Lichtenstein; M R Griffin; R Fought; M L Adams; D G Blazer
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-03-22

6.  Use of a computer-based Medicaid drug data to analyze and correct inappropriate medication use.

Authors:  J Avorn; S B Soumerai
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Use of initial risk assessment and recording as the main nursing intervention in identifying risk of falls.

Authors:  G Udén; M Ehnfors; K Sjöström
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.187

8.  Clinical pharmacists prescribing drug therapy in a geriatric setting: outcome of a trial.

Authors:  J F Thompson; W F McGhan; R L Ruffalo; D A Cohen; B Adamcik; J L Segal
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Linking prescription and patient-identifying data: a pilot study.

Authors:  S F Hurley; J J McNeil; D J Jolley; R Harvey
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1992-03-16       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  Clinical budgeting and drug management on long-stay geriatric wards.

Authors:  F J Gibbins; I Sen; F S Vaz; S Bose
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 10.668

View more
  73 in total

1.  Multidisciplinary medication review in nursing home residents: what are the most significant drug-related problems? The Bergen District Nursing Home (BEDNURS) study.

Authors:  S Ruths; J Straand; H A Nygaard
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-06

2.  Quality use of medicines in aged-care facilities in Australia.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Roughead; Susan J Semple; Andrew L Gilbert
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Development of a quality use of medicines coding system to rate clinical pharmacists' medication review recommendations.

Authors:  Lene Sorensen; Mendel P Grobler; Michael S Roberts
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2003-10

4.  Factors influencing PRN medication use in nursing homes.

Authors:  Julie A Stokes; David M Purdie; Michael S Roberts
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2004-06

Review 5.  Challenge of changing nursing home prescribing culture.

Authors:  Jennifer Tjia; Jerry H Gurwitz; Becky A Briesacher
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Pharmacother       Date:  2012-01-20

6.  Nurse Education to Reduce Harmful Medication Use in Assisted Living Facilities: Effects of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Falls and Cognition.

Authors:  Anna-Liisa Juola; Mikko P Bjorkman; Sarita Pylkkanen; Harriet Finne-Soveri; Helena Soini; Hannu Kautiainen; J Simon Bell; Kaisu H Pitkala
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Usually Available Clinical and Laboratory Data Are Insufficient for a Valid Medication Review: A Crossover Study.

Authors:  K P G M Hurkens; C Mestres-Gonzalvo; H A J M de Wit; P H M van der Kuy; R Janknegt; F Verhey; J M G A Schols; C D A Stehouwer; B Winkens; W Mulder
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 8.  Routine deprescribing of chronic medications to combat polypharmacy.

Authors:  Doron Garfinkel; Birkan Ilhan; Gulistan Bahat
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2015-12

Review 9.  Quasi experimental designs in pharmacist intervention research.

Authors:  Ines Krass
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-01-29

Review 10.  Is medication review by primary-care pharmacists for older people cost effective?: a narrative review of the literature, focusing on costs and benefits.

Authors:  Arnold G Zermansky; Jonathan Silcock
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.