Literature DB >> 11297894

A mail survey of United States hematologists and oncologists: a comparison of business reply versus stamped return envelopes.

M B Streiff1, L Dundes, J L Spivak.   

Abstract

Mailed surveys are a popular means of obtaining data on large populations. In July 1999 a mail survey was conducted among 3000 randomly selected members of the American Society of Hematology to assess their approach to diagnosis and treatment of polycythemia vera. Because the researchers and the study population are members of the same professional organization with a vested interest in the results, we anticipated that the advantages of return stamped postage seen in previous studies would be less significant. The response rate for stamped return envelopes was 38% versus 32% for business reply envelopes. This statistically significant difference (P =.0005) of six percentage points is comparable to previous research. Excluding labor, the total cost per returned survey was $2.62 for business reply envelopes versus $1.82 for stamped return envelopes. We conclude that stamped return envelopes are a more effective and cost-efficient means of procuring data from physician specialists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11297894     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00277-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  6 in total

1.  Sleep-disordered breathing in Michigan: a practice pattern survey.

Authors:  Ronald D Chervin; Cheryl A Moyer; John Palmisano; Alon Y Avidan; Emerson Robinson; Susan L Garetz; Joseph I Helman
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 2.  Increasing response rates from physicians in oncology research: a structured literature review and data from a recent physician survey.

Authors:  Y Martins; R I Lederman; C L Lowenstein; S Joffe; B A Neville; B T Hastings; G A Abel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Professionally designed information materials and telephone reminders improved consent response rates: evidence from an RCT nested within a cohort study.

Authors:  Andy Boyd; Kate Tilling; Rosie Cornish; Amy Davies; Kerry Humphries; John Macleod
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

5.  Does HER2/neu overexpression in breast cancer influence adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy choices by Ontario physicians? A physician survey.

Authors:  J A Myers; G Deboer; E Warner
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Do postage stamps versus pre-paid envelopes increase responses to patient mail surveys? A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Katrina Lavelle; Chris Todd; Malcolm Campbell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.