Literature DB >> 11297586

Relationship between the morphological evaluation of the pituitary and the growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone Plus arginine in children and adults with congenital hypopituitarism.

M Maghnie1, B Salati, S Bianchi, M Rallo, C Tinelli, M Autelli, G Aimaretti, E Ghigo.   

Abstract

The relationship between the hypothalamus-pituitary morphology and the somatotroph responsiveness to maximal provocative tests exploring the GH releasable pool is still unclear. We evaluated the GH-releasing effect of GHRH plus arginine (GHRH plus Arg) in 36 patients with congenital GH deficiency (GHD) according to their pituitary magnetic resonance imaging findings, consisting of anterior pituitary hypoplasia, stalk agenesis (neural and or vascular component), and posterior pituitary ectopia. Seventeen children (12 boys and 5 girls, aged 1--5.2 yr) were evaluated at the time of diagnosis of GHD (mean age, 3.6 +/- 1.4 yr), and 19 adults (13 males and 6 females, aged 15.9-28.6 yr) with childhood-onset GHD were reevaluated after completion of GH treatment (at least 6 months of withdrawal) at a mean age of 20.5 +/- 3.5 yr. Eleven children had isolated GHD, and 6 had multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD) whereas 7 adults had isolated GHD, and 12 had MPHD. A residual vascular component of the pituitary stalk was visualized in 7 children and 7 adults with isolated GHD, whereas magnetic resonance imaging showed complete pituitary stalk agenesis (both vascular and neural components) in 10 children and 10 adults, including 16 with MPHD (6 children) and 4 children with isolated GHD. In the children, the median peak GH response to GHRH plus Arg (7.6 microg/L; range, 2.4--40.2 microg/L) was significantly higher than that in the adults (1.8 microg/L; range, 0.8--37.4 microg/L; P = 0.0039); it was also significantly higher in the isolated GHD patients (18 microg/L; range, 3.3--40.2 microg/L) than in those with MPHD (1.9 microg/L; range, 0.8--7.6 microg/L; P = 0.00004). In the patients with residual vascular component of the pituitary stalk the median peak GH responses to GHRH plus Arg (19.1 microg/L; range, 1.6--40.2 microg/L) was significantly higher than that in patients with complete pituitary stalk agenesis (2.2 microg/L; range, 0.8--8.8 microg/L; P = 0.00005). There was a trend toward a decrease with age in peak GH response to GHRH plus ARG: Mean serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels were 36 +/- 7.1 microg/L in the children and 63.5 +/- 22.6 microg/L in the adults (P = 0.0001). The mean IGF-I level did not differ between the children with (35.7 +/- 4.8 microg/L) and those without (36.3 +/- 8.7 microg/L) the pituitary stalk; it was much higher in the adults with residual vascular pituitary stalk (81.1 +/- 17.7 microg/L) than in those with complete pituitary stalk agenesis (47.7 +/- 12.5 microg/L; P = 0.0002). The IGF-I level was 36.1 +/- 6.7 microg/L in the isolated GHD children and 36 +/- 8.6 microg/L in those with MPHD; levels were 82.1 +/- 19.4 and 52.7 +/- 16.8 microg/L respectively, in the adults (P = 0.003). In this study we have confirmed that the partial integrity of the hypothalamic pituitary connections is essential for GHRH plus Arg to express its GH-releasing activity and have shown that this provocative test is able to stimulate GH secretion to a greater extent in those patients with GHD, but with a residual vascular component of the pituitary stalk. This test is reliable in the diagnosis of congenital hypopituitarism in both children and adults when associated with complete pituitary stalk agenesis and MPHD. In younger children with congenital GHD but less severe impairment of the pituitary stalk the GH response to GHRH plus Arg may be within the normal range; deterioration of pituitary GH reserve with a GH response of less than 10 microg/L after 20 yr of age makes this test very sensitive in the diagnosis of adult GHD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11297586     DOI: 10.1210/jcem.86.4.7394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  19 in total

Review 1.  Growth hormone treatment in adults with growth hormone deficiency: the transition.

Authors:  M E Molitch
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Pituitary stalk interruption syndrome (PSIS).

Authors:  P Vijayanand; Shriraam Mahadevan; Nisha Reddy; N Ramdoss
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 3.  Indications and strategies for continuing GH treatment during transition from late adolescence to early adulthood in patients with GH deficiency: the impact on bone mass.

Authors:  G Saggese; G I Baroncelli; T Vanacore; L Fiore; S Ruggieri; G Federico
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Growth hormone treatment of adolescents with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) during the transition period: results of a survey among adult and paediatric endocrinologists from Italy. Endorsed by SIEDP/ISPED, AME, SIE, SIMA.

Authors:  G Aimaretti; R Attanasio; S Cannavò; M C Nicoletti; R Castello; C Di Somma; P Garofalo; L Iughetti; S Loche; M Maghnie; L Mazzanti; G Saggese; M Salerno; G Tonini; V Toscano; S Zucchini; M Cappa
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Pituitary stalk interruption syndrome in 59 children: the value of MRI in assessment of pituitary functions.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Yanyan Hu; Guimei Li; Xiaojun Sun
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 6.  Growth hormone-releasing hormone combined with arginine or growth hormone secretagogues for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adults.

Authors:  E Ghigo; G Aimaretti; E Arvat; F Camanni
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 7.  [Ectopia of the pituitary].

Authors:  W Saeger
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 8.  Growth hormone deficiency in children.

Authors:  Erick J Richmond; Alan D Rogol
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.107

9.  Unreliability of classic provocative tests for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency.

Authors:  A Mazzola; C Meazza; P Travaglino; S Pagani; D Frattini; E Bozzola; G Corneli; G Aimaretti; M Bozzola
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 10.  Diagnosis of adult GH deficiency.

Authors:  V Gasco; G Corneli; S Rovere; C Croce; G Beccuti; A Mainolfi; S Grottoli; G Aimaretti; E Ghigo
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.