Literature DB >> 11296867

Prey scan at random to evade observant predators.

J Scannell1, G Roberts, J Lazarus.   

Abstract

Anti-predator scans by animals occur with very irregular timing, so that the initiation of scans resembles a random, Poisson-like, process. At first sight, this seems both dangerous (predators could exploit the long intervals) and wastefull (scans after very short intervals are relatively uninformative). We explored vigilance timing using a new model that allows both predators and prey to vary their behaviour. Given predators that attack at random with respect to prey behaviour, constant inter-scan intervals minimize predation risk. However, if prey scan regularly to minimize their risk from randomly attacking predators, they become more vulnerable to predators that initiate attacks when the inter-scan intervals begin. If, in order to defeat this tactic, prey choose extremely variable inter-scan intervals, they become more vulnerable to predators who wait for long intervals before launching attacks. Only if predators can monitor the variability of inter-scan intervals and either attack immediately (if variability is too low) or wait for long intervals to attack (if variability is too high) does the empirically observed pattern of Poisson-like scanning become the optimal prey strategy.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11296867      PMCID: PMC1088638          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  4 in total

1.  Are vigilance sequences a consequence of intrinsic chaos or external changes?

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 2.  Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence.

Authors:  M A Elgar
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1989-02

3.  On the advantages of flocking.

Authors:  H R Pulliam
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Back to the basics of antipredatory vigilance: can nonvigilant animals detect attack?

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.844

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Evolutionary stability of vigilance coordination among social foragers.

Authors:  Miguel A Rodríguez-Gironés; Rodrigo A Vásquez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Good foragers can also be good at detecting predators.

Authors:  W Cresswell; J L Quinn; M J Whittingham; S Butler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A simple rule for the costs of vigilance: empirical evidence from a social forager.

Authors:  Guy Cowlishaw; Michael J Lawes; Margaret Lightbody; Alison Martin; Richard Pettifor; J Marcus Rowcliffe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Evolution of anti-predator traits in response to a flexible targeting strategy by predators.

Authors:  Andrew L Jackson; Guy Beauchamp; Mark Broom; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Prey synchronize their vigilant behaviour with other group members.

Authors:  Olivier Pays; Pierre-Cyril Renaud; Patrice Loisel; Maud Petit; Jean-François Gerard; Peter J Jarman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  An interaction mechanism for the maintenance of fission-fusion dynamics under different individual densities.

Authors:  David Bierbach; Stefan Krause; Pawel Romanczuk; Juliane Lukas; Lenin Arias-Rodriguez; Jens Krause
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.