Literature DB >> 11296471

Psychosocial versus nicotine-only self-report measures for predicting follow-up smoking status.

W J McCarthy1, Y Zhou, Y I Hser.   

Abstract

The most popular measure of tobacco dependence, the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire (FTQ), measures only tobacco-specific behaviors. In contrast, the most popular assessment of addiction among polydrug users is the Addiction Severity Index (ASI). Most of the subscales comprising the ASI are psychosocial measures, not drug-specific measures. A study was undertaken to compare the predictive utility of these two contrasting measures. The NAS (adapted from the FTQ) and the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) were used to predict future smoking status in a cohort of polydrug users followed annually for 3 years. The baseline NAS score explained more of the variance in Time 2 and Time 3 smoking status than did the ASI subscales. When previous smoking status was included as a covariate, however, the NAS no longer predicted future smoking status, whereas the ASI Subscales continued to explain significant variance in future smoking status. Results suggest that when past smoking behavior is known, a respondent's legal status and alcohol use may be more useful than a measure of tobacco dependence for predicting future smoking status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11296471     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005638521562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  19 in total

1.  The American Stop Smoking Intervention Study. Conceptual framework and evaluation design.

Authors:  F Stillman; A Hartman; B Graubard; E Gilpin; D Chavis; J Garcia; L M Wun; L Lynn; M Manley
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  1999-06

2.  Individual change amid stable smoking patterns in polydrug users over 3 years.

Authors:  W J McCarthy; Y Zhou; Y I Hser
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Validation of the modified Fagerström tolerance questionnaire with salivary cotinine among adolescents.

Authors:  A V Prokhorov; C De Moor; U E Pallonen; K S Hudmon; L Koehly; S Hu
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 4.  Measuring nicotine dependence: a review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire.

Authors:  K O Fagerstrom; N G Schneider
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1989-04

5.  Some methodological cautions in the use of the Tolerance Questionnaire.

Authors:  E Lichtenstein; R J Mermelstein
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 6.  Nicotine medications for smoking cessation.

Authors:  J E Henningfield
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-11-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Assessing predictions of violence: being accurate about accuracy.

Authors:  D Mossman
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1994-08

8.  Development of a screening questionnaire for tobacco/nicotine dependence according to ICD-10, DSM-III-R, and DSM-IV.

Authors:  N Kawakami; N Takatsuka; S Inaba; H Shimizu
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  Characteristics of participants who stop smoking and sustain abstinence for 1 and 5 years in the Lung Health Study.

Authors:  R P Murray; L B Gerald; P G Lindgren; J E Connett; C S Rand; N R Anthonisen
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 10.  Reducing the addictiveness of cigarettes. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association.

Authors:  J E Henningfield; N L Benowitz; J Slade; T P Houston; R M Davis; S D Deitchman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Wisconsin Predicting Patients' Relapse questionnaire.

Authors:  Daniel M Bolt; Megan E Piper; Danielle E McCarthy; Sandra J Japuntich; Michael C Fiore; Stevens S Smith; Timothy B Baker
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 4.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.