Literature DB >> 11295612

Oxidative stress in chemoprevention trials.

T L DeWeese1, A M Hruszkewycz, L J Marnett.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer continues to be the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men in the United States. Despite aggressive intervention, a significant number of men with prostate cancer will not be cured of their disease and will face the possibility of metastatic disease. Thus, development of potent prevention strategies to diminish or eliminate this threat is in order. Cellular exposure to chronic oxidative stress may be 1 possible etiologic factor in the development of many cancers, including prostate cancer. Oxygen radicals can attack DNA directly and result in the accumulation of potentially promutagenic oxidized DNA bases such as 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine. In addition, chronic oxidant stress may also result in lipid peroxidation and the subsequent generation of a range of reactive products that can damage DNA. Disruption of certain genes may result in cellular tolerance to oxidative genomic injury. GSTP1 is an enzyme that helps catalyze the conjugation reaction between potentially damaging electrophiles and glutathione. Inactivation of GSTP1 has been documented to occur in nearly 100% of human prostate cancers; it is also frequently inactivated in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia lesions. This inactivation may leave the cell vulnerable to oxidative DNA damage and/or tolerant to accumulation of oxidized DNA base adducts. These base adducts can be measured by several quantitative methods, such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with selected ion monitoring. These sophisticated methods can be readily integrated into prostate cancer chemoprevention studies of new and developing prevention agents by providing quantitative assessment of oxidative DNA damage before and after administration of these candidate chemopreventive drugs. The combination of genetic information, state-of-the-art assessment tools, and novel agents will allow rational, directed prostate cancer chemoprevention studies to be performed and, together, will help determine the role of chronic oxidative stress in the carcinogenic process of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11295612     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00959-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  8 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms involved in the progression of androgen-independent prostate cancers: it is not only the cancer cell's fault.

Authors:  J T Arnold; J T Isaacs
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 2.  Molecular genetics of prostate cancer: new prospects for old challenges.

Authors:  Michael M Shen; Cory Abate-Shen
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 3.  Tumor-stroma co-evolution in prostate cancer progression and metastasis.

Authors:  Sajni Josson; Yasuhiro Matsuoka; Leland W K Chung; Haiyen E Zhau; Ruoxiang Wang
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 4.  Anticancer activity of green tea polyphenols in prostate gland.

Authors:  Pierpaola Davalli; Federica Rizzi; Andrea Caporali; Davide Pellacani; Serena Davoli; Saverio Bettuzzi; Maurizio Brausi; Domenico D'Arca
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 6.543

5.  What can surrogate tissues tell us about the oxidative stress status of the prostate? A hypothesis-generating in-vivo study.

Authors:  Kaitlyn F Whelan; Jian-Ping Lu; Eduard Fridman; Alex Wolf; Alon Honig; Gregory Paulin; Laurence Klotz; Jehonathan H Pinthus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Endogenous melatonin and oxidatively damaged guanine in DNA.

Authors:  Zoreh Davanipour; Henrik E Poulsen; Allan Weimann; Eugene Sobel
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2009-10-18       Impact factor: 2.763

7.  Primary versus castration-resistant prostate cancer: modeling through novel murine prostate cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Georges Daoud; Alissar Monzer; Hisham Bahmad; Farah Chamaa; Layal Hamdar; Tarek H Mouhieddine; Sami Shayya; Assaad Eid; Firas Kobeissy; Yen-Nien Liu; Wassim Abou-Kheir
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-17

8.  Sulfiredoxin as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Advanced and Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Caroline N Barquilha; Nilton J Santos; Caio C D Monção; Isabela C Barbosa; Flávio O Lima; Luis A Justulin; Nelma Pértega-Gomes; Sérgio L Felisbino
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 6.543

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.