Literature DB >> 11295607

Histological markers of risk and the role of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

W A Sakr1, A W Partin.   

Abstract

The marked discrepancy between the prevalence of preclinical prostate cancer and the incidence of clinically manifest disease indicates a long latency phase and significant heterogeneity in the progression potential of early neoplastic lesions. There are a variety of histologic changes within prostatic epithelium that have been termed atypical or dysplastic. The 2 most widely studied of these lesions are prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH). Although associations between AAH and adenocarcinoma are spurious, those linking high-grade PIN (HGPIN) to cancer are far more established. There is a significantly increased risk for patients with isolated HGPIN to have prostate cancer confirmed on subsequent biopsy, suggesting that HGPIN is a marker for prostate carcinoma in addition to its potential role as a premalignant lesion. Autopsy studies reveal that HGPIN is found in association with cancer in 63% to 94% of malignant and 25% to 43% of benign prostates. Data on age and race reveal that African American men develop more extensive HGPIN at a younger age than white men. A wide spectrum of molecular/genetic abnormalities appears to be common to both HGPIN and prostate cancer. Data loss of 8p, 10q, 16q, 18q, and gain of 7q31, 8q, multiple copies of the c-myc genes, along with changes in chromatin texture, telomerase activity, cell cycle status, and proliferative indices collectively suggest that HGPIN is intermediate between benign epithelium and prostatic carcinoma with respect to these markers. These data indicate that HGPIN is important in neoplastic progression, and may present an appropriate target/marker for chemoprevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11295607     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00953-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  15 in total

Review 1.  Gene targeting to the stroma of the prostate and bone.

Authors:  Roger S Jackson; Omar E Franco; Neil A Bhowmick
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 3.880

2.  Detection of pre-neoplastic and neoplastic prostate disease by MALDI profiling of urine.

Authors:  Amosy E M'Koma; David L Blum; Jeremy L Norris; Tatsuki Koyama; Dean Billheimer; Saundra Motley; Mayshan Ghiassi; Nika Ferdowsi; Indrani Bhowmick; Sam S Chang; Jay H Fowke; Richard M Caprioli; Neil A Bhowmick
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 3.  VPAC1-targeted PET/CT scan: improved molecular imaging for the diagnosis of prostate cancer using a novel cell surface antigen.

Authors:  Hong Truong; Leonard G Gomella; Mathew L Thakur; Edouard J Trabulsi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Tumor-infiltrating mesenchymal stem cells: Drivers of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in prostate cancer?

Authors:  Timothy E Krueger; Daniel L J Thorek; Alan K Meeker; John T Isaacs; W Nathaniel Brennen
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  Genomic hypomethylation and CpG island hypermethylation in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasm.

Authors:  Nam-Yun Cho; Jung Ho Kim; Kyung Chul Moon; Gyeong Hoon Kang
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 6.  Chemoprevention of carcinoma prostate: a review.

Authors:  M S Ansari; N P Gupta; A K Hemal
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Molecular evidence that invasive adenocarcinoma can mimic prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and intraductal carcinoma through retrograde glandular colonization.

Authors:  Michael C Haffner; Christopher Weier; Meng Meng Xu; Ajay Vaghasia; Bora Gürel; Berrak Gümüşkaya; David M Esopi; Helen Fedor; Hsueh-Li Tan; Ibrahim Kulac; Jessica Hicks; William B Isaacs; Tamara L Lotan; William G Nelson; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Angelo M De Marzo
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  Risk of prostate cancer after detection of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) on extended core needle biopsy: a UK hospital experience.

Authors:  Paras B Singh; Caroline M Nicholson; Narasimhan Ragavan; Rosemary A Blades; Francis L Martin; Shyam S Matanhelia
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  FGF8 isoform b expression in human prostate cancer.

Authors:  V J Gnanapragasam; M C Robinson; C Marsh; C N Robson; F C Hamdy; H Y Leung
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  cGMP-dependent protein kinase Iβ interacts with p44/WDR77 to regulate androgen receptor-driven gene expression.

Authors:  Liran Zhou; Keiko Hosohata; Shen Gao; Zhongping Gu; Zhengxin Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.