Literature DB >> 11295013

Monocular patching may worsen sensory-attentional neglect: a case report.

A M Barrett1, G P Crucian, D Q Beversdorf, K M Heilman.   

Abstract

To determine whether monocular patching influences the performance of a patient with primarily sensory-attentional bias on the line bisection task, we present a case study of a 49-year-old woman who had right cortical infarction affecting temporal, parietal, and occipital regions. She had primarily sensory-attentional bias when performing the line bisection task on a video apparatus. In hospital, she was tested with monocular eye patching of the left or the right eye or unpatched. Paradoxically, the right-eye patching significantly worsened and the left patch significantly improved performance. The eye may have some input to the ipsilateral as well as the contralateral superior colliculus. Alternatively, the patch-a novel tactile stimulus-may induce orienting to its side via noncollicular mechanisms. When using a monocular patch for any reason, clinicians should be aware that increased spatial bias may occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11295013     DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2001.21973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  14 in total

1.  Perceptual-attentional and motor-intentional bias in near and far space.

Authors:  John P Garza; Paul J Eslinger; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  The blindside: impact of monocular occlusion on spatial attention.

Authors:  D Brandon Burtis; John B Williamson; Monika Mishra; Kenneth M Heilman
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.475

Review 3.  Update on the Clinical Approach to Spatial Neglect.

Authors:  A M Barrett; K E Houston
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Prism adaptation differently affects motor-intentional and perceptual-attentional biases in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Paola Fortis; Kelly M Goedert; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Ipsilesional neglect: behavioral and anatomical correlates.

Authors:  Daniela L Sacchetti; Kelly M Goedert; Anne L Foundas; A M Barrett
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Restoration of Vision After Brain Injury Using Magnet Glasses.

Authors:  Kevin E Houston; Eleftherios I Paschalis; Danielle C Angueira; P Matthew Bronstad; Anna M Barrett; Mary Alexis Iaccarino
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.159

7.  Patching for Diplopia Contraindicated in Patients with Brain Injury?

Authors:  Kevin E Houston; A M Barrett
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Rehabilitation of spatial neglect.

Authors:  Alonso R Riestra; A M Barrett
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

9.  Monocular patching affects inattention but not perseveration in spatial neglect.

Authors:  S Khurshid; H Longin; G P Crucian; A M Barrett
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 0.881

10.  Monocular patching may induce ipsilateral "where" spatial bias.

Authors:  Peii Chen; Lillian Erdahl; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.