Literature DB >> 11294512

Failure of traditional trough levels to predict tacrolimus concentrations.

M Macchi-Andanson1, B Charpiat, R W Jelliffe, C Ducerf, N Fourcade, J Baulieux.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate tacrolimus population parameter values and to evaluate the ability of the maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) Bayesian fitting procedure to predict tacrolimus blood levels, using the traditional strategy of monitoring only trough levels, for dosage individualization in liver transplant patients. Forty patients treated with tacrolimus after liver transplantation were studied during the early posttransplant phase (first 2 weeks). This phase was divided into four time periods (1-4 days, 5-7 days, 8-11 days, 12-14 days). Tacrolimus was administered twice daily. Approximately one determination of a tacrolimus trough level on whole blood was performed each day. The NPEM2 program was used to obtain population pharmacokinetic parameter values. With each individual pharmacokinetic parameter estimated by the MAP Bayesian method for a given period, the authors evaluated the prediction of future levels of tacrolimus for that patient for the next period. This evaluation of Bayesian fitting predictive performance was performed using the USC*PACK clinical software. Mean pharmacokinetic parameter values were in the same general range as previously published values obtained with richer data sets. However, during each period, the percentage of blood levels predicted within 20% did not exceed 40%. The traditional strategy of obtaining only trough whole blood levels does not provide enough dynamic information for the MAP Bayesian fitting procedure (the best method currently available) to be used for adaptive control of drug dosage regimens for oral tacrolimus. The authors suggest modifying the blood concentration monitoring scheme to add at least one other concentration measured during the absorptive or distributive phase to obtain more information about the behavior of the drug. D-Optimal design and similar strategies should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11294512     DOI: 10.1097/00007691-200104000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  11 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus in cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis lung transplant patients and design of Bayesian estimators using limited sampling strategies.

Authors:  Franck Saint-Marcoux; Christiane Knoop; Jean Debord; Philippe Thiry; Annick Rousseau; Marc Estenne; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and determination of area under the curve by abbreviated sampling strategy in Chinese liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Chenghong Peng; Zhicheng Yu; Baiyong Shen; Xiaxing Deng; Weihua Qiu; Yue Fei; Chuan Shen; Guangwen Zhou; Weiping Yang; Hongwei Li
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  The impact of tacrolimus exposure on extrarenal adverse effects in adult renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Olivia Campagne; Donald E Mager; Daniel Brazeau; Rocco C Venuto; Kathleen M Tornatore
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Pathophysiological idiosyncrasies and pharmacokinetic realities may interfere with tacrolimus dose titration in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Itziar Oteo; John C Lukas; Nerea Leal; Elena Suarez; Andres Valdivieso; Mikel Gastaca; Jorge Ortiz de Urbina; Rosario Calvo
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Christine E Staatz; Susan E Tett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling and Bayesian Estimation of Tacrolimus Exposure: Is this Clinically Useful for Dosage Prediction Yet?

Authors:  Emily Brooks; Susan E Tett; Nicole M Isbel; Christine E Staatz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Toward a robust tool for pharmacokinetic-based personalization of treatment with tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation: A model-based meta-analysis approach.

Authors:  Tom M Nanga; Thao T P Doan; Pierre Marquet; Flora T Musuamba
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Time-related clinical determinants of long-term tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in combination therapy with mycophenolic acid and corticosteroids: a prospective study in one hundred de novo renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Dirk R J Kuypers; Kathleen Claes; Pieter Evenepoel; Bart Maes; Willy Coosemans; Jacques Pirenne; Yves Vanrenterghem
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  CYP3A5 genotype-based model to predict tacrolimus dosage in the early postoperative period after living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Eunhee Ji; Myeong Gyu Kim; Jung Mi Oh
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  The Population Pharmacokinetic Models of Tacrolimus in Chinese Adult Liver Transplantation Patients.

Authors:  Liqin Zhu; Hao Wang; Xiaoye Sun; Wei Rao; Wei Qu; Yuan Zhang; Liying Sun
Journal:  J Pharm (Cairo)       Date:  2014-02-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.