Literature DB >> 11294481

Clinical and treatment response characteristics of late-life depression associated with vascular disease: a pooled analysis of two multicenter trials with sertraline.

K R Krishnan1, P M Doraiswamy, C M Clary.   

Abstract

1. The safety and efficacy of sertraline in the treatment of moderate-to-severe major depression in elderly outpatients, aged 60 years and older, with comorbid vascular disease was evaluated. 2. An analysis of the pooled results for the sertraline treatment group drawn from two prospective, randomized, double-blind studies (sertraline vs. fluoxetine, and sertraline vs. nortriptyline) was done. Patients were retrospectively categorized into one of 3 clinical groups: 1) patients with a current diagnosis of hypertension but no other past or present cardiovascular illness (HTN), 2) patients reporting a current or past history of cardiovascular illness, but excluding hypertension (VASC), and 3) patients with no hypertension, and no other comorbid vascular illness (NoVASC). Patients received 12-3. weeks of double-blind treatment with sertraline in flexible daily doses in the range of 50 - 150 mg (in the nortriptyline comparator trial) or 50 - 100 mg (in the fluoxetine comparator trial). 4. Sertraline treatment yielded comparable levels of response in all 3 groups (response criterion: CGI-much or very much improved) at treatment endpoint on both a completer analysis (HTN, 86%; VASC, 89%; NoVASC, 77%) and significantly higher response rates on a 12-week endpoint analysis (HTN, 74%; VASC, 69%; NoVASC, 58%; p < 0.05). Sertraline treatment was well-tolerated, with no between-group differences in rates of adverse events, or in discontinuation due to adverse events. Patients taking 5 or more concomitant medications showed no difference, when compared with patients taking none-or-one concomitant medication, either in rates of adverse events, or in discontinuation due to adverse events. 5. Sertraline was found to be a safe, well-tolerated, and effective as an antidepressant in elderly patients suffering from hypertension and other forms of vascular comorbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11294481     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-5846(00)00168-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0278-5846            Impact factor:   5.067


  5 in total

Review 1.  Disruption of fetal hormonal programming (prenatal stress) implicates shared risk for sex differences in depression and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  J M Goldstein; R J Handa; S A Tobet
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 8.606

2.  The impact of concomitant medication use on patient eligibility for phase I cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Mitesh J Borad; Kelly K Curtis; Hani M Babiker; Martin Benjamin; Raoul Tibes; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Karen Wright; Amylou C Dueck; Gayle Jameson; Daniel D Von Hoff
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 3.  Sex differences in major depression and comorbidity of cardiometabolic disorders: impact of prenatal stress and immune exposures.

Authors:  Jill M Goldstein; Taben Hale; Simmie L Foster; Stuart A Tobet; Robert J Handa
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  The safety and tolerability of duloxetine in depressed elderly patients with and without medical comorbidity.

Authors:  T N Wise; C G Wiltse; D V Iosifescu; M Sheridan; J Y Xu; J Raskin
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Can Antidepressant Drug Impact on Blood Pressure Level in Patients with Psychiatric Disorder and Hypertension? A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Seyed Kazem Razavi Ratki; Seyedmostafa Seyedhosseini; Alieh Valizadeh; Tahere Rastgoo; Rozita Tavakkoli; Allahyar Golabchi; Fatemeh Esteki Ghashghaei; Seyede Mahdieh Nemayandeh; Amirreza Boroomand; Atefeh Shirinzade
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2016-01-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.