OBJECTIVE: In patients with cirrhosis, the relationships between haemodynamic alterations and the development of ascites or the occurrence of refractory ascites are unknown. The aim of the present study was to compare haemodynamic measurements obtained in patients with non-refractory ascites to haemodynamic measurements obtained in patients without ascites and in patients with refractory ascites. METHODS: A cohort of 121 patients was prospectively studied, of whom 29 patients did not have ascites, 45 had non-refractory ascites and 47 had refractory ascites. Splanchnic, renal and systemic haemodynamics were measured in all patients. RESULTS: The hepatic venous pressure gradient was significantly higher in patients with non-refractory ascites than in patients without ascites (18.5 +/- 0.8 mmHg versus 15.8 +/- 0.7 mmHg). Renal and systemic haemodynamics did not significantly differ between patients with non-refractory ascites and patients without ascites. The glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow were significantly lower in patients with refractory ascites than in patients with non-refractory ascites (77 +/- 4 versus 107 +/- 5 ml/min and 867 +/- 62 versus 1,008 +/- 68 ml/min, respectively). Splanchnic and systemic haemodynamics did not significantly differ between patients with refractory ascites and patients with non-refractory ascites. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cirrhosis, an increase in portal hypertension was the sole haemodynamic alteration related to the development of ascites. Renal vasoconstriction (and subsequent renal hypoperfusion and hypofiltration) was the only haemodynamic alteration related to the occurrence of refractory ascites. The development of ascites or refractory ascites was not associated with any alteration in systemic haemodynamics.
OBJECTIVE: In patients with cirrhosis, the relationships between haemodynamic alterations and the development of ascites or the occurrence of refractory ascites are unknown. The aim of the present study was to compare haemodynamic measurements obtained in patients with non-refractory ascites to haemodynamic measurements obtained in patients without ascites and in patients with refractory ascites. METHODS: A cohort of 121 patients was prospectively studied, of whom 29 patients did not have ascites, 45 had non-refractory ascites and 47 had refractory ascites. Splanchnic, renal and systemic haemodynamics were measured in all patients. RESULTS: The hepatic venous pressure gradient was significantly higher in patients with non-refractory ascites than in patients without ascites (18.5 +/- 0.8 mmHg versus 15.8 +/- 0.7 mmHg). Renal and systemic haemodynamics did not significantly differ between patients with non-refractory ascites and patients without ascites. The glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow were significantly lower in patients with refractory ascites than in patients with non-refractory ascites (77 +/- 4 versus 107 +/- 5 ml/min and 867 +/- 62 versus 1,008 +/- 68 ml/min, respectively). Splanchnic and systemic haemodynamics did not significantly differ between patients with refractory ascites and patients with non-refractory ascites. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cirrhosis, an increase in portal hypertension was the sole haemodynamic alteration related to the development of ascites. Renal vasoconstriction (and subsequent renal hypoperfusion and hypofiltration) was the only haemodynamic alteration related to the occurrence of refractory ascites. The development of ascites or refractory ascites was not associated with any alteration in systemic haemodynamics.
Authors: Damien du Cheyron; Bruno Bouchet; Brigitte Cauquelin; Damien Guillotin; Michel Ramakers; Cédric Daubin; Jean-Jacques Ballet; Pierre Charbonneau Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-09-29 Impact factor: 17.440